Lune

SIGMOD2020顶会

In-Memory Subgraph Matching: An In-depth Study

Shixuan Sun, Qiong Luo

2020年份
159被引次数
45顶会引用

摘要

We study the performance of eight representative in-memory subgraph matching algorithms. Specifically, we put QuickSI, GraphQL, CFL, CECI, DP-iso, RI and VF2++ in a common framework to compare them on the following four aspects: (1) method of filtering candidate vertices in the data graph;

(2) method of ordering query vertices; (3) method of enumerating partial results; and (4) other optimization techniques. Then, we compare the overall performance of these algorithms with Glasgow, an algorithm based on the constraint programming. Through experiments, we find that (1) the filtering method of GraphQL is competitive to that of the latest algorithms CFL, CECI and DP-iso in terms of pruning power; (2) the ordering methods in GraphQL and RI are usually the most effective; (3) the set intersection based local candidate computation in CECI and DP-iso performs the best in the enumeration; and (4) the failing sets pruning in DP-iso can significantly improve the performance when queries become large. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/RapidsAtHKUST/SubgraphMatching.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper45

问问它们各自怎么用它

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖