Atomic Commitment Across Blockchains
Victor Zakhary, Divy Agrawal, Amr El Abbadi
摘要
The recent adoption of blockchain technologies and open permissionless networks suggest the importance of peer-to-peer atomic cross-chain transaction protocols. Users should be able to atomically exchange tokens and assets without depending on centralized intermediaries such as exchanges. Recent peer-to-peer atomic cross-chain swap protocols use hashlocks and timelocks to ensure that participants comply to the protocol. However, an expired timelock could lead to a violation of the all-or-nothing atomicity property. An honest participant who fails to execute a smart contract on time due to a crash failure, denial of service attacks or even network delays might end up losing assets. Although a crashed participant is the only participant who ends up worse off, current proposals are unsuitable for atomic cross-chain transactions in asynchronous environments where crash failures and network delays are the norm. In this paper, we present AC3WN, the first decentralized all-or-nothing atomic cross-chain commitment protocol. The redeem and refund events of the smart contracts that exchange assets are modeled as conflicting events. An open permissionless network of witnesses is used to guarantee that conflicting events could never simultaneously occur and either all smart contracts in an atomic cross-chain transaction are redeemed or all of them are refunded.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper11
- A Transactional Perspective on Execute-order-validate BlockchainsPingcheng Ruan, Dumitrel Loghin, Quang-Trung Ta, Meihui Zhang 等SIGMOD 2020 · 被引用 117 次
- ByShard: Sharding in a Byzantine EnvironmentJelle Hellings, Mohammad SadoghiVLDB 2021 · 被引用 103 次
- SoK: Security and Privacy of Blockchain InteroperabilityAndré Augusto, Rafael Belchior, Miguel Correia, André Vasconcelos 等S&P 2024 · 被引用 90 次
- Authenticated Keyword Search in Scalable Hybrid-Storage BlockchainsCe Zhang, Cheng Xu, Haixin Wang, Jianliang Xu 等ICDE 2021 · 被引用 88 次
- Cross-chain Deals and Adversarial CommerceMaurice Herlihy, Liuba Shrira, Barbara LiskovVLDB 2020 · 被引用 61 次
它引用的顶会 Paper2
- A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open BlockchainsLoi Luu, Viswesh Narayanan, Chaodong Zheng, Kunal Baweja 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 1,392 次
- Enhancing Bitcoin Security and Performance with Strong Consistency via Collective SigningEleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Nicolas Gailly, Ismail Khoffi 等USENIX Security 2016 · 被引用 769 次
相关 Paper
- Parallelizing Universal Atomic Swaps for Multi-Chain Cryptocurrency ExchangesDanlei Xiao, Chuan Zhang, Haotian Deng, Jinwen Liang 等USENIX Security 2025
- BrokerAS: Towards Fault-tolerant Atomic Cross-chain SwapsGaowei Shi, Xiulong Liu, Huan Wang, Yuhan Li 等INFOCOM 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- Universal Atomic Swaps: Secure Exchange of Coins Across All BlockchainsSri Aravinda Krishnan Thyagarajan, Giulio Malavolta, Pedro Moreno-SanchezS&P 2022 · 被引用 112 次
- XCLAIM: Trustless, Interoperable, Cryptocurrency-Backed AssetsAlexei Zamyatin, Dominik Harz, Joshua Lind, Panayiotis Panayiotou 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 222 次
- Warning! The Timeout T Cannot Protect You From Losing Coins: PipeSwap: Forcing the Timely Release of a Secret for Atomic Cross-Chain SwapsPeifang Ni, Anqi Tian, Jing XuS&P 2025
