TSB-AutoAD: Towards Automated Solutions for Time-Series Anomaly Detection [E, A & B]
Qinghua Liu, Seunghak Lee, John Paparrizos
摘要
Despite decades of research on time-series anomaly detection, the effectiveness of existing anomaly detectors remains constrained to specific domains - a model that performs well on one dataset may fail on another. Consequently, developing automated solutions for anomaly detection remains a pressing challenge. However, the AutoML community has predominantly focused on supervised learning solutions, which are impractical for anomaly detection due to the lack of labeled data and the absence of a well-defined objective function for model evaluation. While recent studies have evaluated standalone anomaly detectors, no study has ever evaluated automated solutions for selecting or generating scores in an automated manner. In this study, we (i) provide a systematic review and taxonomy of automated solutions for time-series anomaly detection, categorizing them into selection, ensembling, and generation methods; (ii) introduce TSB-AutoAD, a comprehensive benchmark encompassing 20 standalone methods and 70 variants; and (iii) conduct the most extensive evaluation in this area to date. Our benchmark includes state-of-the-art methods across all three categories, evaluated on TSB-AD, a recently curated heterogeneous testbed from nine domains. Our findings reveal a significant gap, where over half of the existing solutions do not statistically outperform a simple random choice. Foundation models that claim to offer generalized, one-size-fits-all solutions have yet to deliver on this promise. While naive ensembling achieves high accuracy, it comes at a substantial computational overhead. Conversely, methods leveraging historical datasets enable fast inference but suffer under out-of-distribution conditions. To address this trade-off, we propose a selective ensembling solution, which combines model selection with ensembling to offer a lightweight, practical balance between accuracy and efficiency. We open-source TSB-AutoAD and highlight the need for more robust and efficient solutions.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper29
- Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association DiscrepancyJiehui Xu, Haixu Wu, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng LongICLR 2022 · 被引用 960 次
- TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series DataShreshth Tuli, Giuliano Casale, Nicholas R. JenningsVLDB 2022 · 被引用 930 次
- A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingAbhimanyu Das, Weihao Kong, Rajat Sen, Yichen ZhouICML 2024 · 被引用 601 次
- Anomaly Detection in Time Series: A Comprehensive EvaluationSebastian Schmidl, Phillip Wenig, Thorsten PapenbrockVLDB 2022 · 被引用 578 次
- MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation ModelsMononito Goswami, Konrad Szafer, Arjun Choudhry, Yifu Cai 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 442 次
相关 Paper
- Choose Wisely: An Extensive Evaluation of Model Selection for Anomaly Detection in Time SeriesEmmanouil Sylligardos, Paul Boniol, John Paparrizos, Panos E. Trahanias 等VLDB 2023 · 被引用 40 次
- TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection MethodsXiangfei Qiu, Zhe Li, Wanghui Qiu, Shiyan Hu 等VLDB 2025 · 被引用 57 次
- TSB-UAD: An End-to-End Benchmark Suite for Univariate Time-Series Anomaly DetectionJohn Paparrizos, Yuhao Kang, Paul Boniol, Ruey S. Tsay 等VLDB 2022 · 被引用 138 次
- AutoTSAD: Unsupervised Holistic Anomaly Detection for Time Series DataSebastian Schmidl, Felix Naumann, Thorsten PapenbrockVLDB 2024 · 被引用 22 次
- PaAno: Patch-Based Representation Learning for Time-Series Anomaly DetectionJinju Park, Seokho KangICLR 2026 · 被引用 6 次
