Spurious Correlation Learning in Preference Optimization: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Mitigation via Tie Training
Christian Moya, Alex Semendinger, Guang Lin, Elliott Thornley
摘要
Preference learning methods like Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) are known to induce reliance on spurious correlations, leading to sycophancy and length bias in today's language models and potentially severe goal misgeneralization in future systems. In this work, we provide a unified theoretical analysis of this phenomenon, characterizing the mechanisms of spurious learning, its consequences on deployment, and a provable mitigation strategy. Focusing on log-linear policies, we show that standard preference-learning objectives induce reliance on spurious features at the population level through two channels: mean spurious bias and causal-spurious correlation leakage. We then show that this reliance creates an irreducible vulnerability to distribution shift: more data from the same training distribution fails to reduce the model's dependence on spurious features. To address this, we propose tie training , a data augmentation strategy using ties (equal-utility preference pairs) to introduce data-driven regularization. We demonstrate that this approach selectively reduces spurious learning without degrading causal learning. Finally, we validate our theory on log-linear models and provide empirical evidence that both the spurious learning mechanisms and the benefits of tie training persist for neural networks and large language models.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper15
- Defining and Characterizing Reward GamingJoar Skalse, Nikolaus H. R. Howe, Dmitrii Krasheninnikov, David KruegerNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 466 次
- Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object RecognitionKai Yuanqing Xiao, Logan Engstrom, Andrew Ilyas, Aleksander MadryICLR 2021 · 被引用 451 次
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 346 次
- AlpaGasus: Training a Better Alpaca with Fewer DataLichang Chen, Shiyang Li, Jun Yan, Hai Wang 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 295 次
- Principled Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback from Pairwise or K-wise ComparisonsBanghua Zhu, Michael I. Jordan, Jiantao JiaoICML 2023 · 被引用 273 次
相关 Paper
- Flattery, Fluff, and Fog: Diagnosing and Mitigating Idiosyncratic Biases in Preference ModelsAnirudh Bharadwaj, Chaitanya Malaviya, Nitish Joshi, Mark YatskarICLR 2026 · 被引用 15 次
- Controlling Learned Effects to Reduce Spurious Correlations in Text ClassifiersParikshit Bansal, Amit SharmaACL 2023 · 被引用 1 次
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 119 次
- How RLHF Amplifies SycophancyItai Shapira, Gerdus Benade, Ariel ProcacciaICML 2026 · 被引用 16 次
- Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Logit Space Efficiently Enhances Direct Preference OptimizationHaocheng Luo, Zehang Deng, Thanh-Toan Do, Mehrtash Harandi 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
