Right for the Right Concept: Revising Neuro-Symbolic Concepts by Interacting With Their Explanations
Wolfgang Stammer, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting
摘要
Most explanation methods in deep learning map importance estimates for a model's prediction back to the original input space. These "visual" explanations are often insufficient, as the model's actual concept remains elusive. Moreover, without insights into the model's semantic concept, it is difficult -if not impossible-to intervene on the model's behavior via its explanations, called Explanatory Interactive Learning. Consequently, we propose to intervene on a Neuro-Symbolic scene representation, which allows one to revise the model on the semantic level, e.g. "never focus on the color to make your decision". We compiled a novel confounded visual scene data set, the CLEVR-Hans data set, capturing complex compositions of different objects. The results of our experiments on CLEVR-Hans demonstrate that our semantic explanations, i.e. compositional explanations at a per-object level, can identify confounders that are not identifiable using "visual" explanations only. More importantly, feedback on this semantic level makes it possible to revise the model from focusing on these factors.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper29
- Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic AbstractionQuentin Delfosse, Hikaru Shindo, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian KerstingNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 64 次
- Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structureAndrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Ishita Dasgupta, Stephanie C. Y. Chan 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 51 次
- A Rationale-Centric Framework for Human-in-the-loop Machine LearningJinghui Lu, Linyi Yang, Brian MacNamee, Yue ZhangACL 2022 · 被引用 46 次
- Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck ModelsMert Yüksekgönül, Maggie Wang, James ZouICLR 2023 · 被引用 37 次
- Neuro-Symbolic Continual Learning: Knowledge, Reasoning Shortcuts and Concept RehearsalEmanuele Marconato, Gianpaolo Bontempo, Elisa Ficarra, Simone Calderara 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 34 次
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Object-Centric Learning with Slot AttentionFrancesco Locatello, Dirk Weissenborn, Thomas Unterthiner, Aravindh Mahendran 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 1,275 次
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 1,233 次
- Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More GroundedRamprasaath Ramasamy Selvaraju, Stefan Lee, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin 等ICCV 2019 · 被引用 288 次
- Interpretations are Useful: Penalizing Explanations to Align Neural Networks with Prior KnowledgeLaura Rieger, Chandan Singh, W. James Murdoch, Bin YuICML 2020 · 被引用 249 次
- Restricting the Flow: Information Bottlenecks for AttributionKarl Schulz, Leon Sixt, Federico Tombari, Tim LandgrafICLR 2020 · 被引用 220 次
相关 Paper
- ConceptExplainer: Interactive Explanation for Deep Neural Networks from a Concept PerspectiveJinbin Huang, Aditi Mishra, Bum Chul Kwon, Chris BryanIEEE VIS 2022 · 被引用 46 次
- FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI MethodsRobin Hesse, Simone Schaub-Meyer, Stefan RothICCV 2023 · 被引用 50 次
- Overlooked Factors in Concept-Based Explanations: Dataset Choice, Concept Learnability, and Human CapabilityVikram V. Ramaswamy, Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Ruth Fong, Olga RussakovskyCVPR 2023
- Compositional Explanations of NeuronsJesse Mu, Jacob AndreasNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 229 次
- Interpretable Visual Reasoning via Induced Symbolic SpaceZhonghao Wang, Kai Wang, Mo Yu, Jinjun Xiong 等ICCV 2021 · 被引用 22 次
