On the Mysteries of MAX NAE-SAT
Joshua Brakensiek, Neng Huang, Aaron Potechin, Uri Zwick
摘要
Abstract. MAX NAE-SAT is a natural optimization problem, closely related to its better-known relative MAX SAT. The approximability status of MAX NAE-SAT is almost completely understood if all clauses have the same size [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text]. We refer to this problem as MAX NAE-[Formula: see text]-SAT. For [Formula: see text], it is a slight extension of the celebrated MAX CUT problem. For [Formula: see text], it is related to the MAX CUT problem in graphs that can be fractionally covered by triangles. For [Formula: see text], it is known that an approximation ratio of [Formula: see text], obtained by choosing a random assignment, is optimal, assuming [Formula: see text]. For every [Formula: see text], an approximation ratio of at least [Formula: see text] can be obtained for MAX NAE-[Formula: see text]-SAT. There was some hope, therefore, that there is also a [Formula: see text]-approximation algorithm for MAX NAE-SAT, where clauses of all sizes are allowed simultaneously. Our main result is that there is no [Formula: see text]-approximation algorithm for MAX NAE-SAT, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC). In fact, even for almost satisfiable instances of MAX NAE-[Formula: see text]-SAT (i.e., MAX NAE-SAT where all clauses have size 3 or 5), the best approximation ratio that can be achieved, assuming UGC, is at most [Formula: see text]. Using calculus of variations, we extend the analysis of O’Donnell and Wu for MAX CUT to MAX NAE-[Formula: see text]-SAT. We obtain an optimal algorithm, assuming UGC, for MAX NAE-[Formula: see text]-SAT, slightly improving on previous algorithms. The approximation ratio of the new algorithm is about 0.9089. This gives a full understanding of MAX NAE-[Formula: see text]-SAT for every [Formula: see text]. Interestingly, the rounding function used by this optimal algorithm is the solution of an integral equation. We complement our theoretical results with some experimental results. We describe an approximation algorithm for almost satisfiable instances of MAX NAE-[Formula: see text]-SAT with a conjectured approximation ratio of 0.8728, and an approximation algorithm for almost satisfiable instances of MAX NAE-SAT with a conjectured approximation ratio of 0.8698. We further conjecture that these are essentially the best approximation ratios that can be achieved for these problems, assuming the UGC. Somewhat surprisingly, the rounding functions used by these approximation algorithms are nonmonotone step functions that assume only the values [Formula: see text].
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- SDPs and Robust Satisfiability of Promise CSPJoshua Brakensiek, Venkatesan Guruswami, Sai SandeepSTOC 2023 · 被引用 8 次
- Separating MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUTJoshua Brakensiek, Neng Huang, Aaron Potechin, Uri ZwickFOCS 2023 · 被引用 3 次
- On Lifting Integrality Gaps to SSEH Hardness for Globally Constrained CSPsSuprovat Ghoshal, Euiwoong LeeFOCS 2023 · 被引用 1 次
- MAX BISECTION might be harder to approximate than MAX CUTJoshua Brakensiek, Neng Huang, Aaron Potechin, Uri ZwickSODA 2026
- On Approximability of Satisfiable k-CSPs: VAmey Bhangale, Subhash Khot, Dor MinzerSTOC 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper2
相关 Paper
- Approximation Algorithms and Hardness for Strong Unique GamesSuprovat Ghoshal, Anand LouisSODA 2021 · 被引用 3 次
- Are Graph Neural Networks Optimal Approximation Algorithms?Morris Yau, Nikolaos Karalias, Eric Lu, Jessica Xu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 23 次
- Subexponential LPs Approximate Max-CutSamuel B. Hopkins, Tselil Schramm, Luca TrevisanFOCS 2020 · 被引用 9 次
- Constraint Satisfaction Problems with AdviceSuprovat Ghoshal, Konstantin Makarychev, Yury MakarychevSODA 2025
- Improved Algorithms for Maximum Satisfiability and Its Special CasesKirill Brilliantov, Vasily Alferov, Ivan BliznetsAAAI 2023 · 被引用 6 次
