SpecTaint: Speculative Taint Analysis for Discovering Spectre Gadgets
Zhenxiao Qi, Qian Feng, Yueqiang Cheng, Mengjia Yan, Peng Li, Heng Yin, Tao Wei
摘要
—Software patching is a crucial mitigation approach against Spectre-type attacks. It utilizes serialization instructions to disable speculative execution of potential Spectre gadgets in a program. Unfortunately, there are no effective solutions to detect gadgets for Spectre-type attacks. In this paper, we propose a novel Spectre gadget detection technique by enabling dynamic taint analysis on speculative execution paths. To this end, we simulate and explore speculative execution at system level (within a CPU emulator). We have implemented a prototype called SpecTaint to demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed approach. We evaluated SpecTaint on our Spectre Samples Dataset, and compared SpecTaint with existing state-of-the-art Spectre gadget detection approaches on real-world applications. Our experimental results demonstrate that SpecTaint outperforms existing methods with respect to detection precision and recall by large margins, and it also detects new Spectre gadgets in real-world applications such as Caffe and Brotli. Besides, SpecTaint significantly reduces the performance overhead after patching the detected gadgets, compared with other approaches.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper19
- Rage Against the Machine Clear: A Systematic Analysis of Machine Clears and Their Implications for Transient Execution AttacksHany Ragab, Enrico Barberis, Herbert Bos, Cristiano GiuffridaUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 76 次
- SoK: Practical Foundations for Software Spectre DefensesSunjay Cauligi, Craig Disselkoen, Daniel Moghimi, Gilles Barthe 等S&P 2022 · 被引用 59 次
- Cats vs. Spectre: An Axiomatic Approach to Modeling Speculative Execution AttacksHernán Ponce de León, Johannes KinderS&P 2022 · 被引用 35 次
- InSpectre Gadget: Inspecting the Residual Attack Surface of Cross-privilege Spectre v2Sander Wiebing, Alvise de Faveri Tron, Herbert Bos, Cristiano GiuffridaUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 32 次
- Phantom: Exploiting Decoder-detectable MispredictionsJohannes Wikner, Daniël Trujillo, Kaveh RazaviMICRO 2023 · 被引用 19 次
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 2,435 次
- Meltdown: Reading Kernel Memory from User SpaceMoritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Gruss, Thomas Prescher 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,456 次
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,175 次
- Inferring Fine-grained Control Flow Inside SGX Enclaves with Branch ShadowingSangho Lee, Ming-Wei Shih, Prasun Gera, Taesoo Kim 等USENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 536 次
- LAVA: Large-Scale Automated Vulnerability AdditionBrendan Dolan-Gavitt, Patrick Hulin, Engin Kirda, Tim Leek 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 354 次
相关 Paper
- Kasper: Scanning for Generalized Transient Execution Gadgets in the Linux KernelBrian Johannesmeyer, Jakob Koschel, Kaveh Razavi, Herbert Bos 等NDSS 2022
- Exorcist: Enabling Atomic-Level Runtime Detection of Spectre Attacks using Precise Event Based SamplingHao Jia, Haoyu Ma, Changfeng Ding, Jinku LiFSE 2026
- SpecFuzz: Bringing Spectre-type vulnerabilities to the surfaceOleksii Oleksenko, Bohdan Trach, Mark Silberstein, Christof FetzerUSENIX Security 2020
- Hunting the Haunter - Efficient Relational Symbolic Execution for Spectre with Haunted RelSELesly-Ann Daniel, Sébastien Bardin, Tamara RezkNDSS 2021
- Conditional address propagation: an efficient defense mechanism against transient execution attacksPeinan Li, Rui Hou, Lutan Zhao, Yifan Zhu 等DAC 2022 · 被引用 1 次
