Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model Pretraining
Tyler A. Chang, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Tolga Bolukbasi, Lucas Dixon, Ian Tenney
摘要
Training data attribution (TDA) methods aim to attribute model outputs back to specific training examples, and the application of these methods to large language model (LLM) outputs could significantly advance model transparency and data curation. However, it has been challenging to date to apply these methods to the full scale of LLM pretraining. In this paper, we refine existing gradient-based methods to work effectively at scale, allowing us to retrieve influential examples for an 8Bparameter language model from a pretraining corpus of over 160B tokens with no need for subsampling or pre-filtering. Our method combines several techniques, including optimizer state correction, a task-specific Hessian approximation, and normalized encodings, which we find to be critical for performance at scale. In quantitative evaluations on a fact tracing task, our method performs best at identifying examples that influence model predictions, but classical, model-agnostic retrieval methods such as BM25 still perform better at finding passages which explicitly contain relevant facts. These results demonstrate a misalignment between factual attribution and causal influence. With increasing model size and training tokens, we find that influence more closely aligns with factual attribution. Finally, we examine different types of examples identified as influential by our method, finding that while many directly entail a particular fact, others support the same output by reinforcing priors on relation types, common entities, and names. We release our prompt set and model outputs, along with a web-based visualization tool to explore influential examples for factual predictions, commonsense reasoning, arithmetic, and open-ended generation for an 8B-parameter LLM. 1 * Work done as a student researcher at Google Research and Google DeepMind.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper8
- DataMIL: Selecting Data for Robot Imitation Learning with DatamodelsShivin Dass, Alaa Khaddaj, Logan Engstrom, Aleksander Madry 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 34 次
- Bayesian Influence Functions for Hessian-Free Data AttributionPhilipp Alexander Kreer, Wilson Wu, Maxwell Adam, Zach Furman 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 14 次
- A Snapshot of Influence: A Local Data Attribution Framework for Online Reinforcement LearningYuzheng Hu, Fan Wu, Haotian Ye, David A. Forsyth 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- Enhancing Training Data Attribution with Representational OptimizationWeiwei Sun, Haokun Liu, Nikhil Kandpal, Colin A. Raffel 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 9 次
- Learning to Weight Parameters for Training Data AttributionShuangqi Li, Hieu Le, Jingyi Xu, Mathieu SalzmannICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
它引用的顶会 Paper12
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 2,916 次
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 784 次
- Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail KnowledgeNikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 623 次
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal 等ACL 2020 · 被引用 602 次
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 460 次
相关 Paper
- Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error ConsiderationKangxi Wu, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi ChengEMNLP 2024
- DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion ModelsYongchan Kwon, Eric Wu, Kevin Wu, James ZouICLR 2024 · 被引用 112 次
- Procedural Knowledge in Pretraining Drives Reasoning in Large Language ModelsLaura Ruis, Maximilian Mozes, Juhan Bae, Siddhartha Rao Kamalakara 等ICLR 2025
- The Atlas of In-Context Learning: How Attention Heads Shape In-Context Retrieval AugmentationPatrick Kahardipraja, Reduan Achtibat, Thomas Wiegand, Wojciech Samek 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 13 次
- Which Data Attributes Stimulate Math and Code Reasoning? An Investigation via Influence FunctionsSiqi Kou, Qingyuan Tian, Hanwen Xu, Zihao Zeng 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 9 次
