Grounding Generative Planners in Verifiable Logic: A Hybrid Architecture for Trustworthy Embodied AI
Feiyu Wu, Xu Zheng, Yue Qu, Zhuocheng Wang, Zicheng Feng, Hui Li
摘要
While Large Language Models (LLMs) show immense promise as planners for embodied AI, their stochastic nature and lack of formal reasoning capabilities prevent the strict safety guarantees required for physical deployment. Current approaches fall short: they either rely on other unreliable LLMs for safety checks or simply reject unsafe plans without offering a path to success. This work bridges this critical gap by introducing the Verifiable Iterative Refinement Framework (VIRF), a neuro-symbolic architecture that shifts the paradigm from a passive safety gatekeeper to an active safety collaborator. Where prior verifiers simply reject failures, our framework provides causal, pedagogical feedback that teaches the LLM why its plan was unsafe, enabling intelligent repairs rather than mere avoidance. Our core contribution is a novel tutor-apprentice dialogue, where a deterministic Logic Tutor, grounded in a formal safety ontology, provides causal and explanatory feedback to an LLM Apprentice planner. This pedagogical interaction allows the apprentice to perform intelligent, creative plan repairs, resolving safety conflicts rather than merely avoiding them. To ground this dialogue in verifiable truth, we introduce a scalable knowledge acquisition pipeline that synthesizes a comprehensive safety knowledge base from real-world documents, a process that simultaneously reveals and corrects significant blind spots in existing benchmarks. On a new suite of challenging home safety tasks, VIRF achieves a perfect 0% Hazardous Action Rate (HAR), completely eliminating unsafe actions while attaining a 77.3% Goal-Condition Rate (GCR)-the highest among all baselines. It does so with remarkable efficiency, requiring only 1.1 correction iterations on average. By acting as a verifiable safety scaffold, VIRF demonstrates a principled and robust pathway toward building embodied agents that are not just capable, but fundamentally trustworthy. Code is available at https://github.com/Sn0wm1an/VIRF .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 19,162 次
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,989 次
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,828 次
相关 Paper
- Towards Reliable Code-as-Policies: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Embodied Task PlanningSanghyun Ahn, Wonje Choi, Junyong Lee, Jinwoo Park 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 14 次
- Verifiable, Debuggable, and Repairable Commonsense Logical Reasoning via LLM-based Theory ResolutionArmin Toroghi, Willis Guo, Ali Pesaranghader, Scott SannerEMNLP 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Subtle Risks, Critical Failures: A Framework for Diagnosing Physical Safety of LLMs for Embodied Decision MakingYejin Son, Minseo Kim, Sungwoong Kim, Seungju Han 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 7 次
- Beyond Oracle: Verifier-Supervision for Instruction Hierarchy in Reasoning and Instruction-Tuned LLMsSian-Yao Huang, Li-Hsien Chang, Che-Yu Lin, Cheng-Lin YangNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 4 次
- Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic VerificationChuxue Cao, Jinluan Yang, Haoran Li, Kunhao Pan 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 3 次
