Large Language Models are Versatile Decomposers: Decomposing Evidence and Questions for Table-based Reasoning
Yunhu Ye, Binyuan Hui, Min Yang, Binhua Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li
摘要
Table-based reasoning has shown remarkable progress in a wide range of table-based tasks. It is a challenging task, which requires reasoning over both free-form natural language (NL) questions and (semi-)structured tabular data. However, previous table-based reasoning solutions usually suffer from significant performance degradation on ''huge'' evidence (tables). In addition, most existing methods struggle to reason over complex questions since the essential information is scattered in different places. To alleviate the above challenges, we exploit large language models (LLMs) as decomposers for effective table-based reasoning, which (i) decompose huge evidence (a huge table) into sub-evidence (a small table) to mitigate the interference of useless information for table reasoning, and (ii) decompose a complex question into simpler sub-questions for text reasoning. First, we use a powerful LLM to decompose the evidence involved in the current question into the sub-evidence that retains the relevant information and excludes the remaining irrelevant information from the ''huge'' evidence. Second, we propose a novel ''parsing-execution-filling'' strategy to decompose a complex question into simper step-by-step sub-questions by generating intermediate SQL queries as a bridge to produce numerical and logical sub-questions with a powerful LLM. Finally, we leverage the decomposed sub-evidence and sub-questions to get the final answer with a few in-context prompting examples. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets (TabFact, WikiTableQuestion, and FetaQA) demonstrate that our method achieves significantly better results than competitive baselines for table-based reasoning. Notably, our method outperforms human performance for the first time on the TabFact dataset. In addition to impressive overall performance, our method also has the advantage of interpretability, where the returned results are to some extent tractable with the generated sub-evidence and sub-questions. For reproducibility, we release our source code and data at: https://github.com/AlibabaResearch/DAMO-ConvAI.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper54
- TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language ModelsSi-An Chen, Lesly Miculicich, Julian Eisenschlos, Zifeng Wang 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 86 次
- Decompose, Analyze and Rethink: Solving Intricate Problems with Human-like Reasoning CycleShangzi Xue, Zhenya Huang, Jiayu Liu, Xin Lin 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 55 次
- OpenTab: Advancing Large Language Models as Open-domain Table ReasonersKezhi Kong, Jiani Zhang, Zhengyuan Shen, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 40 次
- DocLLM: A Layout-Aware Generative Language Model for Multimodal Document UnderstandingDongsheng Wang, Natraj Raman, Mathieu Sibue, Zhiqiang Ma 等ACL 2024 · 被引用 37 次
- Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and FutureZheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Weijiang Yu 等ACL 2024 · 被引用 36 次
它引用的顶会 Paper25
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 2,039 次
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 被引用 1,539 次
相关 Paper
- Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table UnderstandingZilong Wang, Hao Zhang, Chun-Liang Li, Julian Martin Eisenschlos 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 244 次
- AixelAsk: A Stepwise-Guided Retrieval and Reasoning Framework for Large Table QAChi Zhang, Meihui Zhang, Yuxin Yang, Tao Chen 等SIGMOD 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table ReasoningRohit Khoja, Devanshu Gupta, Yanjie Fu, Dan Roth 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Syllogism-Inspired TableQA: Evidentialization Makes Decomposition Reasoning and Answer Verification More ReliableZhe Zhang, Lili Bai, Chaopeng Guo, Jie SongAAAI 2026
- CRT-QA: A Dataset of Complex Reasoning Question Answering over Tabular DataZhehao Zhang, Xitao Li, Yan Gao, Jian-Guang LouEMNLP 2023 · 被引用 3 次
