PAC-Learning for Strategic Classification
Ravi Sundaram, Anil Vullikanti, Haifeng Xu, Fan Yao
摘要
Machine learning (ML) algorithms may be susceptible to being gamed by individuals with knowledge of the algorithm (a.k.a. Goodhart's law). Such concerns have motivated a surge of recent work on strategic classification where each data point is a self-interested agent and may strategically manipulate his features to induce a more desirable classification outcome for himself. Previous works assume agents have homogeneous preferences and all equally prefer the positive label. This paper generalizes strategic classification to settings where different data points may have different preferences over the classification outcomes. Besides a richer model, this generalization allows us to include evasion attacks in adversarial ML also as a special case of our model where positive [resp. negative] data points prefer the negative [resp. positive] label, and thus for the first time allows strategic and adversarial learning to be studied under the same framework. We introduce the strategic VC-dimension (SVC), which captures the PAC-learnability of a hypothesis class in our general strategic setup. SVC generalizes the notion of adversarial VC-dimension (AVC) introduced recently by Cullina et al. arXiv:1806.01471. We then instantiate our framework for arguably the most basic hypothesis class, i.e., linear classifiers. We fully characterize the statistical learnability of linear classifiers by pinning down its SVC and the computational tractability by pinning down the complexity of the empirical risk minimization problem. Our bound of SVC for linear classifiers also strictly generalizes the AVC bound for linear classifiers in arXiv:1806.01471. Finally, we briefly study the power of randomization in our strategic classification setup. We show that randomization may strictly increase the accuracy in general, but will not help in the special case of adversarial classification under evasion attacks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper27
- Strategic Classification in the DarkGanesh Ghalme, Vineet Nair, Itay Eilat, Inbal Talgam-Cohen 等ICML 2021 · 被引用 70 次
- Strategic Classification Made PracticalSagi Levanon, Nir RosenfeldICML 2021 · 被引用 68 次
- Information Discrepancy in Strategic LearningYahav Bechavod, Chara Podimata, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Juba ZianiICML 2022 · 被引用 57 次
- Generalized Strategic Classification and the Case of Aligned IncentivesSagi Levanon, Nir RosenfeldICML 2022 · 被引用 30 次
- Fairness Interventions as (Dis)Incentives for Strategic ManipulationXueru Zhang, Mohammad Mahdi Khalili, Kun Jin, Parinaz Naghizadeh 等ICML 2022 · 被引用 27 次
它引用的顶会 Paper5
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 被引用 9,786 次
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu 等S&P 2018 · 被引用 867 次
- Learning Strategy-Aware Linear ClassifiersYiling Chen, Yang Liu, Chara PodimataNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 110 次
- Causal Strategic Linear RegressionYonadav Shavit, Benjamin L. Edelman, Brian AxelrodICML 2020 · 被引用 91 次
- Incentive-Aware PAC LearningHanrui Zhang, Vincent ConitzerAAAI 2021 · 被引用 54 次
相关 Paper
- Conservative classifiers do consistently well with improving agents: characterizing statistical and online learningDravyansh Sharma, Alec SunNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Learning Losses for Strategic ClassificationTosca Lechner, Ruth UrnerAAAI 2022 · 被引用 26 次
- Strategic Classification under Unknown Personalized ManipulationHan Shao, Avrim Blum, Omar MontasserNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 23 次
- Bayesian Strategic ClassificationLee Cohen, Saeed Sharifi-Malvajerdi, Kevin Stangl, Ali Vakilian 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 18 次
- Strategic Classification With ExternalitiesSafwan Hossain, Evi Micha, Yiling Chen, Ariel D. ProcacciaICLR 2025
