Lune

NDSS2021顶会

ALchemist: Fusing Application and Audit Logs for Precise Attack Provenance without Instrumentation

Le Yu, Shiqing Ma, Zhuo Zhang, Guanhong Tao, Xiangyu Zhang, Dongyan Xu, Vincent E. Urias, Han Wei Lin, Gabriela F. Ciocarlie, Vinod Yegneswaran, Ashish Gehani

出版方
2021年份
21顶会引用

摘要

—Cyber-attacks are becoming more persistent and complex. Most state-of-the-art attack forensics techniques either require annotating and instrumenting software applications or rely on high quality execution profiling to serve as the basis for anomaly detection. We propose a novel attack forensics technique ALchemist . It is based on the observations that built-in application logs provide critical high-level semantics and audit logs provide low-level fine-grained information; and the two share a lot of common elements. ALchemist is hence a log fusion technique that couples application logs and audit logs to derive critical attack information invisible in either log. It is based on a relational reasoning engine Datalog and features the capabilities of inferring new relations such as the task structure of execution (e.g., tabs in firefox ), especially in the presence of complex asynchronous execution models, and high-level dependencies between log events. Our evaluation on 15 popular applications including firefox , Chromium , and OpenOffice , and 14 APT attacks from the literature demonstrates that although ALchemist does not require instrumentation, it is highly effective in partitioning execution to autonomous tasks (in order to avoid bogus dependencies) and deriving precise attack provenance graphs, with very small overhead. It also outperforms NoDoze and OmegaLog, two state-of-the-art techniques that do not require instrumentation.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper21

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper14

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖