Explainable Fault Localization for Programming Assignments via LLM-Guided Annotation
Fang Liu, Tianze Wang, Li Zhang, Zheyu Yang, Jing Jiang, Zian Sun
摘要
Providing timely and personalized guidance for students’ programming assignments, particularly by indicating fine-grained error locations with explanations, offers significant practical value for helping students complete assignments and enhance their learning outcomes. In recent years, various automated Fault Localization (FL) techniques, particularly those leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs), have demonstrated promising results in identifying errors in programs. However, existing fault localization techniques face challenges when applied to educational contexts. Most approaches operate at the method level without explanatory feedback, resulting in granularity too coarse for students who need actionable insights to identify and fix their errors. While some approaches attempt line-level fault localization, they often depend on predicting line numbers directly in numerical form, which is ill-suited to LLMs. To address these challenges, we propose FLAME, a fine-grained, explainable Fault Localization method tailored for programming assignments via LLM-guided Annotation and Model Ensemble. FLAME leverages rich contextual information specific to programming assignments to guide LLMs in identifying faulty code lines. Instead of directly predicting line numbers, we prompt the LLM to annotate faulty code lines with detailed explanations, enhancing both localization accuracy and educational value. To further improve reliability, we introduce a weighted multi-model voting strategy that aggregates results from multiple LLMs to determine the suspiciousness of each code line. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that FLAME outperforms state-of-the-art fault localization baselines on programming assignments, successfully localizing 207 more faults at top-1 over the best-performing baseline. Beyond educational contexts, FLAME also generalizes effectively to general-purpose software codebases, outperforming all baselines on the Defects4J benchmark.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 681 次
- Boosting coverage-based fault localization via graph-based representation learningYiling Lou, Qihao Zhu, Jinhao Dong, Xia Li 等FSE 2021 · 被引用 157 次
- Fault Localization with Code Coverage Representation LearningYi Li, Shaohua Wang, Tien N. NguyenICSE 2021 · 被引用 120 次
- Large Language Models for Test-Free Fault LocalizationAidan Z. H. Yang, Claire Le Goues, Ruben Martins, Vincent J. HellendoornICSE 2024 · 被引用 98 次
相关 Paper
- A Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of LLM-Based Explainable Fault LocalizationSungmin Kang, Gabin An, Shin YooFSE 2024 · 被引用 69 次
- Let the Code Speak: Incorporating Program Dynamic State for Better Method-Level Fault LocalizationYihao Qin, Shangwen Wang, Bo Lin, Xin Peng 等ASE 2025
- FastFixer: An Efficient and Effective Approach for Repairing Programming AssignmentsFang Liu, Zhenwei Liu, Qianhui Zhao, Jing Jiang 等ASE 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Counterexample Guided Program Repair Using Zero-Shot Learning and MaxSAT-based Fault LocalizationPedro Orvalho, Mikolás Janota, Vasco M. ManquinhoAAAI 2025 · 被引用 4 次
- Project-Scale Statement-Level Fault Localization via Multi-view Semantic Learning and Pairwise RerankingHongwei Yu, Xu Wang, Jian Zhang, Xiangxin Meng 等ISSTA 2026
