You Are Who You Appear to Be: A Longitudinal Study of Domain Impersonation in TLS Certificates
Richard Roberts, Yaelle Goldschlag, Rachel Walter, Taejoong Chung, Alan Mislove, Dave Levin
摘要
The public key infrastructure (PKI) provides the fundamental property of authentication: the means by which users can know with whom they are communicating online. The PKI ensures end-to-end authenticity insofar as it verifies a chain of certificates, but the true final step in end-to-end authentication comes when the user verifies that the website is what they expect. To this end, users are expected to evaluate domain names, but various "domain impersonation" attacks threaten their ability to do so. Indeed, if a user could be easily tricked into believing that amazon.com-offers.com is actually amazon.com, then, coupled with security indicators like a lock icon, users could believe that they have a secure connection to Amazon. We study this threat to end-to-end authentication: (1) We introduce a new classification of an impersonation attack that we call target embedding. This embeds an entire target domain, unmodified, using one or more subdomains of the actual domain. (2) We perform a user study with the specific goal of understanding whether users fall for target embedding, and how its efficacy compares to other popular impersonation attacks (typosquatting, combosquatting, and homographs). We find that target embedding is the most effective against modern browsers. (3) Using all HTTPS certificates collected by Censys, we perform a longitudinal analysis of how target-embedding impersonation has evolved, who is responsible for issuing impersonating certificates, who hosts the domains, where the economic choke-points are, and more. We close with a discussion of counter-measures against this growing threat. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Spoofing attacks; Web protocol security; Economics of security and privacy.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper15
- Compromised or Attacker-Owned: A Large Scale Classification and Study of Hosting Domains of Malicious URLsRavindu De Silva, Mohamed Nabeel, Charith Elvitigala, Issa Khalil 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 45 次
- Can I Take Your Subdomain? Exploring Same-Site Attacks in the Modern WebMarco Squarcina, Mauro Tempesta, Lorenzo Veronese, Stefano Calzavara 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 30 次
- Measuring Identity Confusion with Uniform Resource LocatorsJoshua Reynolds, Deepak Kumar, Zane Ma, Rohan Subramanian 等CHI 2020 · 被引用 30 次
- Assessing Browser-level Defense against IDN-based PhishingHang Hu, Steve T. K. Jan, Yang Wang, Gang WangUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 22 次
- What's in a Name? Exploring CA Certificate ControlZane Ma, Joshua Mason, Manos Antonakakis, Zakir Durumeric 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 16 次
它引用的顶会 Paper3
- Hiding in Plain Sight: A Longitudinal Study of Combosquatting AbusePanagiotis Kintis, Najmeh Miramirkhani, Charles Lever, Yizheng Chen 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 166 次
- Measurement and Analysis of Private Key Sharing in the HTTPS EcosystemFrank Cangialosi, Taejoong Chung, David R. Choffnes, Dave Levin 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 89 次
- The Web's Identity Crisis: Understanding the Effectiveness of Website Identity IndicatorsChristopher Thompson, Martin Shelton, Emily Stark, Max Walker 等USENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 48 次
相关 Paper
- On the Unnecessary Complexity of Names in X.509 and Their Impact on ImplementationsYuteng Sun, Joyanta Debnath, Wenzheng Hong, Omar Chowdhury 等FSE 2025
- Bamboozling Certificate Authorities with BGPHenry Birge-Lee, Yixin Sun, Anne Edmundson, Jennifer Rexford 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 83 次
- Talking with Familiar Strangers: An Empirical Study on HTTPS Context Confusion AttacksMingming Zhang, Xiaofeng Zheng, Kaiwen Shen, Ziqiao Kong 等CCS 2020 · 被引用 15 次
- Characterizing and Mitigating Phishing Attacks at ccTLD ScaleGiovane C. M. Moura, Thomas Daniels, Maarten Bosteels, Sebastian Castro 等CCS 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- Domain Validation++ For MitM-Resilient PKIMarkus Brandt, Tianxiang Dai, Amit Klein, Haya Schulmann 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 71 次
