PACER: Acyclic Causal Discovery from Large-scale Interventional Data
Ramon Viñas Torné, Sílvia Fàbregas Salazar, Soyon Park, Ivo Alexander Ban, Artyom Gadetsky, Nikita Doikov, Maria Brbic
摘要
Inferring the structure of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) from data is a central challenge in causal discovery, particularly in modern high-dimensional settings where large-scale interventional data are increasingly available. While interventional data can improve identifiability, existing methods remain limited by soft acyclicity constraints, leading to optimization over invalid cyclic graphs, numerical instability, and reduced scalability. We introduce PACER (Perturbation-driven Acyclic Causal Edge Recovery), a scalable framework for causal discovery that guarantees acyclicity by construction. PACER parameterizes a distribution over DAGs through a joint model of variable permutations and edge probabilities, enabling direct optimization over valid causal structures without surrogate penalties. The framework supports a unified likelihood-based treatment of observational and interventional data, flexible conditional density models, and the incorporation of structural prior knowledge. For linear-Gaussian mechanisms, we derive closed-form expressions for the expected interventional log-likelihood and its gradients, yielding substantial computational gains. Empirically, PACER matches or exceeds state-of-the-art methods on protein signaling and large-scale genetic perturbation benchmarks, while scaling efficiently to networks with thousands of variables and achieving up to two orders of magnitude speedups over penalty-based differentiable approaches. These results demonstrate that exact and scalable causal discovery from high-dimensional perturbation data is achievable through principled search space design.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Gradient-Based Neural DAG LearningSébastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, Simon Lacoste-JulienICLR 2020 · 被引用 337 次
- Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional DataPhilippe Brouillard, Sébastien Lachapelle, Alexandre Lacoste, Simon Lacoste-Julien 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 295 次
- Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy to GameAlexander G. Reisach, Christof Seiler, Sebastian WeichwaldNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 213 次
- Efficient Neural Causal Discovery without Acyclicity ConstraintsPhillip Lippe, Taco Cohen, Efstratios GavvesICLR 2022 · 被引用 95 次
- Large-Scale Differentiable Causal Discovery of Factor GraphsRomain Lopez, Jan-Christian Hütter, Jonathan K. Pritchard, Aviv RegevNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 78 次
相关 Paper
- Differentiable Cyclic Causal Discovery Under Unmeasured ConfoundersMuralikrishnna G. Sethuraman, Faramarz FekriNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- Stable Differentiable Causal DiscoveryAchille Nazaret, Justin Hong, Elham Azizi, David M. BleiICML 2024 · 被引用 29 次
- ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic GraphsRyan Thompson, Edwin V. Bonilla, Robert KohnNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- DAG Learning on the PermutahedronValentina Zantedeschi, Luca Franceschi, Jean Kaddour, Matt J. Kusner 等ICLR 2023
- Continuous Bayesian Model Selection for Multivariate Causal DiscoveryAnish Dhir, Ruby Sedgwick, Avinash Kori, Ben Glocker 等ICML 2025
