Lune

ICLR2026顶会

BTZSC: A Benchmark for Zero-Shot Text Classification Across Cross-Encoders, Embedding Models, and Rerankers

Ilias Aarab

摘要

Zero-shot text classification (ZSC) offers the promise of eliminating costly taskspecific annotation by matching texts directly to human-readable label descriptions. While early approaches have predominantly relied on cross-encoder models fine-tuned for natural language inference (NLI), recent advances in text-embedding models, rerankers, and instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) have challenged the dominance of NLI-based architectures. Yet, systematically comparing these diverse approaches remains difficult. Existing evaluations, such as MTEB, often incorporate labeled examples through supervised probes or fine-tuning, leaving genuine zero-shot capabilities underexplored. To address this, we introduce BTZSC, a comprehensive benchmark of 22 public datasets spanning sentiment, topic, intent, and emotion classification, capturing diverse domains, class cardinalities, and document lengths. Leveraging BTZSC, we conduct a systematic comparison across four major model families, NLI cross-encoders, embedding models, rerankers and instruction-tuned LLMs, encompassing 38 public and custom checkpoints. Our results show that: (i) modern rerankers, exemplified by Qwen3-Reranker-8B, set a new state-of-the-art with macro F 1 = 0.72; (ii) strong embedding models such as GTE-large-en-v1.5 substantially close the accuracy gap while offering the best trade-off between accuracy and latency; (iii) instruction-tuned LLMs at 4-12B parameters achieve competitive performance (macro F 1 up to 0.67), excelling particularly on topic classification but trailing specialized rerankers; (iv) NLI cross-encoders plateau even as backbone size increases; and (v) scaling primarily benefits rerankers and LLMs over embedding models. BTZSC and accompanying evaluation code are publicly released to support fair and reproducible progress in zero-shot text understanding. 1 * The views expressed in this paper are of the author only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank or the Eurosystem.

问 Lune

尽管问,回答会引用原文。

Lune 会读完全文和相关的 Paper,每个回答都附上所依据的原文段落。

可以从这些问题问起

Lune 的依据

全文 · 相关的 Paper

获取答案

免费开始,无需绑卡

它引用的 Paper16

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 次引用
  2. Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh 等ICML 2021 · 47,906 次引用
  3. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 次引用
  4. Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 4,966 次引用
  5. SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 次引用

相关 Paper

  1. NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding ModelsChankyu Lee, Rajarshi Roy, Mengyao Xu, Jonathan Raiman 等ICLR 2025
  2. MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding BenchmarkKenneth C. Enevoldsen, Isaac Chung, Imene Kerboua, Márton Kardos 等ICLR 2025 · 10 次引用
  3. Adapting Language Models for Zero-shot Learning by Meta-tuning on Dataset and Prompt CollectionsRuiqi Zhong, Kristy Lee, Zheng Zhang, Dan KleinEMNLP Findings 2021 · 101 次引用
  4. Zero-shot Topical Text Classification with LLMs - an Experimental StudyShai Gretz, Alon Halfon, Ilya Shnayderman, Orith Toledo-Ronen 等EMNLP Findings 2023 · 17 次引用
  5. MAIR: A Massive Benchmark for Evaluating Instructed RetrievalWeiwei Sun, Zhengliang Shi, Wu Long, Lingyong Yan 等EMNLP 2024 · 1 次引用
黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖