Why is SAM Robust to Label Noise?
Christina Baek, J. Zico Kolter, Aditi Raghunathan
摘要
Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) is most known for achieving state-of the-art performances on natural image and language tasks. However, its most pronounced improvements (of tens of percent) is rather in the presence of label noise. Understanding SAM's label noise robustness requires a departure from characterizing the robustness of minimas lying in "flatter" regions of the loss landscape. In particular, the peak performance under label noise occurs with early stopping, far before the loss converges. We decompose SAM's robustness into two effects: one induced by changes to the logit term and the other induced by changes to the network Jacobian. The first can be observed in linear logistic regression where SAM provably up-weights the gradient contribution from clean examples. Although this explicit up-weighting is also observable in neural networks, when we intervene and modify SAM to remove this effect, surprisingly, we see no visible degradation in performance. We infer that SAM's effect in deeper networks is instead explained entirely by the effect SAM has on the network Jacobian. We theoretically derive the implicit regularization induced by this Jacobian effect in two layer linear networks. Motivated by our analysis, we see that cheaper alternatives to SAM that explicitly induce these regularization effects largely recover the benefits in deep networks trained on real-world datasets.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper11
- An Analysis of Concept Bottleneck Models: Measuring, Understanding, and Mitigating the Impact of Noisy AnnotationsSeonghwan Park, Jueun Mun, Donghyun Oh, Namhoon LeeNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- Enhancing Sample Selection Against Label Noise by Cutting Mislabeled Easy ExamplesSuqin Yuan, Lei Feng, Bo Han, Tongliang LiuNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- Lookbehind-SAM: k steps back, 1 step forwardGonçalo Mordido, Pranshu Malviya, Aristide Baratin, Sarath ChandarICML 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Membership Privacy Risks of Sharpness Aware MinimizationYoung In Kim, Andrea Agiollo, Pratiksha Agrawal, Johannes O. Royset 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Improving Model-Based Reinforcement Learning by Converging to Flatter MinimaShrinivas Ramasubramanian, Benjamin Freed, Alexandre Capone, Jeff G. SchneiderNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
它引用的顶会 Paper21
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 被引用 1,861 次
- Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data HurtPreetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 1,108 次
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 917 次
- Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy LabelsSheng Liu, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Narges Razavian, Carlos Fernandez-GrandaNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 798 次
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 705 次
相关 Paper
- Why Does Sharpness-Aware Minimization Generalize Better Than SGD?Zixiang Chen, Junkai Zhang, Yiwen Kou, Xiangning Chen 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 32 次
- How Sharpness-Aware Minimization Minimizes Sharpness?Kaiyue Wen, Tengyu Ma, Zhiyuan LiICLR 2023 · 被引用 3 次
- Sharpness-Aware Minimization Can Hallucinate MinimizersChanwoong Park, Uijeong Jang, Ernest Ryu, Insoon YangICML 2026
- On Saddle Point Avoidance and Stationary Distribution of Sharpness-Aware MinimizationTao Sun, Fan Jia, Bao WangKDD 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Sharpness-Aware Minimization Efficiently Selects Flatter Minima Late In TrainingZhanpeng Zhou, Mingze Wang, Yuchen Mao, Bingrui Li 等ICLR 2025
