Testing noisy linear functions for sparsity
Xue Chen, Anindya De, Rocco A. Servedio
摘要
We consider the following basic inference problem: there is an unknown high-dimensional vector w ∈ R n , and an algorithm is given access to labeled pairs (x, y) where x ∈ R n is a measurement and y = w • x + noise. What is the complexity of deciding whether the target vector w is (approximately) k-sparse? The recovery analogue of this problem -given the promise that w is sparse, find or approximate the vector w -is the famous sparse recovery problem, with a rich body of work in signal processing, statistics, and computer science. We study the decision version of this problem (i.e. deciding whether the unknown w is ksparse) from the vantage point of property testing. Our focus is on answering the following high-level question: when is it possible to efficiently test whether the unknown target vector w is sparse versus far-from-sparse using a number of samples which is completely independent of the dimension n? We consider the natural seting in which x is drawn from a i.i.d. product distribution D over R n and the noise process is independent of the input x. As our main result, we give a general algorithm which solves the above-described testing problem using a number of samples which is completely independent of the ambient dimension n, as long as D is not a Gaussian. In fact, our algorithm is fully noise tolerant, in the sense that for an arbitrary w, it approximately computes the distance of w to the closest k-sparse vector. To complement this algorithmic result, we show that weakening any of our conditions makes it information-theoretically impossible for any algorithm to solve the testing problem with fewer than essentially log n samples. Thus our conditions essentially characterize when it is possible to test noisy linear functions for sparsity with constant sample complexity. Our algorithmic approach is based on relating the cumulants of the output distribution (i.e. of y) with elementary power sum symmetric polynomials in w and using the latter to measure the sparsity of w. This approach crucially relies on a theorem of Marcinkiewicz from probability theory. In fact, to obtain effective sample complexity bounds with our approach, we prove a new finitary version of Marcinkiewicz's theorem. This involves extending the complex analytic arguments used in the original proof with results about the distribution of zeros of entire functions.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper4
- Testing Convex TruncationAnindya De, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. ServedioSODA 2023 · 被引用 3 次
- Testing Noisy Low-Degree Polynomials for SparsityYiqiao Bao, Anindya De, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. Servedio 等STOC 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Variance estimation in compound decision theory under boundednessSubhodh KotekalNeurIPS 2024
- Halfspaces are hard to test with relative errorXi Chen, Anindya De, Yizhi Huang, Shivam Nadimpalli 等SODA 2026
相关 Paper
- Sparse Linear Regression Is Easy on Random SupportsGautam Chandrasekaran, Raghu Meka, Konstantinos StavropoulosSTOC 2026
- Robust Testing in High-Dimensional Sparse ModelsAnand Jerry George, Clément L. CanonneNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 4 次
- Detecting Low-Degree TruncationAnindya De, Huan Li, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. ServedioSTOC 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Independence Testing for Bounded Degree Bayesian NetworksArnab Bhattacharyya, Clément L. Canonne, Joy Qiping YangNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 9 次
- The Price of Sparsity: Sufficient Conditions for Sparse Recovery using Sparse and Sparsified MeasurementsYoussef Chaabouni, David GamarnikNeurIPS 2025
