EdgeRefine: Privacy-Utility Balance for Graphs via Jaccard Sampling under Edge Differential Privacy
Wenxiu Ding, Muzhi Liu, Zheng Yan, Mingjun Wang, Yifan Zhao, Qiao Liu
摘要
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown considerable success in learning from graph-structured data. However, their application in privacy-sensitive areas remains difficult as the structural information of graphs is prone to leaking sensitive link information. To satisfy edge-level differential privacy, a common approach is to directly inject noise into all elements of the graph's adjacency matrix, thereby obfuscating the existence of any single edge. While increased noise strengthens privacy protection, excessive noise reduces utility. Privacy-utility balance becomes a major barrier to practical privacy-preserving graph learning. To address this issue, we propose EdgeRefine, a new local differential privacy framework that rethinks the privacy-utility trade-off in graph learning through adaptive edge refinement. EdgeRefine first estimates edge-existence probabilities using Jaccard similarity and ranks edges accordingly for noisy edge removal. To ensure the sparsity and reliability of the final graph, we leverage the privacy budget 𝜖 to determine the ratio of true to false edges, sample them separately based on the previously obtained probability ranking, and then control the total number of edges with a separate sampling rate 𝑘. We conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of EdgeRefine, which achieves accuracy comparable to the noise-free baseline and performs much better than other privacy-preserving methods on various datasets and GNN architectures. Under privacy budget 𝜖 = 2.5, EdgeRefine achieves significant node classification accuracy improvements over state-of-the-art baselines: 17.8% on ACM under GAT and 19.7% on Cora under GCN. In graph classification task, an average accuracy degradation of around 5% has also been achieved compared to noise-free baseline. Under graph reconstruction attacks, EdgeRefine maintains relative absolute error levels consistently above 1 across all privacy budgets (averaging 1.962 on Cora and 1.472 on AMAP), indicating strong resilience against privacy leakage. CCS Concepts • Security and privacy; • Computing methodologies → Machine learning; • Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis;
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- Generating Synthetic Decentralized Social Graphs with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Ting Yu, Yin Yang, Issa Khalil 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 266 次
- LINKTELLER: Recovering Private Edges from Graph Neural Networks via Influence AnalysisFan Wu, Yunhui Long, Ce Zhang, Bo LiS&P 2022 · 被引用 125 次
- MuSe-GNN: Learning Unified Gene Representation From Multimodal Biological Graph DataTianyu Liu, Yuge Wang, Rex Ying, Hongyu ZhaoNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 44 次
- Distributionally Robust Graph-based Recommendation SystemBohao Wang, Jiawei Chen, Changdong Li, Sheng Zhou 等WWW 2024 · 被引用 42 次
- Blink: Link Local Differential Privacy in Graph Neural Networks via Bayesian EstimationXiaochen Zhu, Vincent Y. F. Tan, Xiaokui XiaoCCS 2023 · 被引用 16 次
相关 Paper
- GAP: Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks with Aggregation PerturbationSina Sajadmanesh, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Aurélien Bellet, Daniel Gatica-PerezUSENIX Security 2023
- Achieving Personalized Privacy-Preserving Graph Neural Network via Topology AwarenessDian Lei, Zijun Song, Yanli Yuan, Chunhai Li 等WWW 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- Differentially Private Decoupled Graph Convolutions for Multigranular Topology ProtectionEli Chien, Wei-Ning Chen, Chao Pan, Pan Li 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 33 次
- LPGNet: Link Private Graph Networks for Node ClassificationAashish Kolluri, Teodora Baluta, Bryan Hooi, Prateek SaxenaCCS 2022 · 被引用 24 次
- Locally Private Graph Neural NetworksSina Sajadmanesh, Daniel Gatica-PerezCCS 2021 · 被引用 124 次
