InnoGym: Benchmarking the Innovation Potential of AI Agents
Jintian Zhang, Kewei Xu, Jingsheng Zheng, Zhuoyun Yu, Yuqi Zhu, Yujie Luo, Lanning Wei, Shuofei Qiao, Lun Du, Da Zheng, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
摘要
LLMs and Agents have achieved impressive progress in code generation, mathematical reasoning, and scientific discovery. However, existing benchmarks primarily measure correctness, overlooking the diversity of methods behind solutions. True innovation depends not only on producing correct answers but also on the originality of the approach. We present InnoGym, the first benchmark and framework designed to systematically evaluate the innovation potential of AI agents. InnoGym introduces two complementary metrics: performance gain, which measures improvement over the best-known solutions, and novelty, which captures methodological differences from prior approaches. The benchmark includes 18 carefully curated tasks from real-world engineering and scientific domains, each standardized through resource filtering, evaluator validation, and solution collection. In addition, we provide iGym, a unified execution environment for reproducible and long-horizon evaluations. Extensive experiments show that while some agents produce novel approaches, their lack of robustness limits performance gains. These results highlight a key gap between creativity and effectiveness, underscoring the need for benchmarks that evaluate both. Building on this framework, we present InnoGym, which consists of two complementary components: iBench and iGym. iBench is the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the innovation potential of AI agents. It includes 18 carefully curated Improvable Tasks, selected from † Corresponding author.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper14
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 被引用 24,064 次
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 9,171 次
- Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encodingThomas Müller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, Alexander KellerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 被引用 4,089 次
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 2,082 次
- Neural Sparse Voxel FieldsLingjie Liu, Jiatao Gu, Kyaw Zaw Lin, Tat-Seng Chua 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 1,535 次
相关 Paper
- InnovatorBench: Evaluating Agents' Ability to Conduct Innovative AI ResearchYunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Weiye Si, Zhen Huang 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 9 次
- Assessing the Creativity of LLMs in Proposing Novel Solutions to Mathematical ProblemsJunyi Ye, Jingyi Gu, Xinyun Zhao, Wenpeng Yin 等AAAI 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Automated Creativity Evaluation of Language Models Across Open-Ended TasksTan Min Sen, Zachary Choy Kit Chun, Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff, Nadya Yuki Wangsajaya 等ACL 2026
- DevOps-Gym: Benchmarking AI Agents in Software DevOps CycleYuheng Tang, Kaijie Zhu, Bonan Ruan, Chuqi Zhang 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 10 次
- HeuriGym: An Agentic Benchmark for LLM-Crafted Heuristics in Combinatorial OptimizationHongzheng Chen, Yingheng Wang, Yaohui Cai, Hins Hu 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 26 次
