Catalytic approaches to the tree evaluation problem
James Cook, Ian Mertz
摘要
The study of branching programs for the Tree Evaluation Problem (TreeEval), introduced by S. Cook et al. (TOCT 2012), remains one of the most promising approaches to separating L from P. Given a label in [𝑘] at each leaf of a complete binary tree and an explicit function in [𝑘] 2 → [𝑘] for recursively computing the value of each internal node from its children, the problem is to compute the value at the root node. (While the original problem allows an arbitrary-degree tree, we focus on binary trees.) The problem is parameterized by the alphabet size 𝑘 and the height ℎ of the tree.
A branching program implementing the straightforward recursive algorithm uses Θ((𝑘 + 1) ℎ ) states, organized into 2 ℎ -1 layers of width up to 𝑘 ℎ . Until now no better deterministic algorithm was known.
We present a series of three new algorithms solving TreeEval. They are inspired by the work of Buhrman et al. on catalytic space (STOC 2012), applied outside the catalytic-space setting. First we give a novel branching program with 2 4ℎ poly(𝑘) layers of width 2 3𝑘 , which beats the straightforward algorithm when ℎ = 𝜔 (𝑘/log 𝑘). Next we give a branching program with 𝑘 2ℎ poly(𝑘) layers of width 𝑘 3 . This has total size comparable to the straightforward algorithm, but is implemented using the catalytic framework. Finally we interpolate between the two algorithms to give a branching program with (𝑂 ( 𝑘 ℎ )) 2ℎ poly(𝑘) layers of width (𝑂 ( 𝑘 ℎ )) 𝜖ℎ for any constant 𝜖 > 0, which beats the straightforward algorithm for all ℎ ≥ 𝑘 1/2+poly 𝜖 . These are the first deterministic branching programs to beat the straightforward algorithm, but more importantly this is the first non-trivial approach to proving deterministic upper bounds for TreeEval.
We also contribute new machinery to the catalytic computing program, which may be of independent interest to some readers.
• Theory of computation → Computational complexity and cryptography; Design and analysis of algorithms.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper7
- Bipartite Matching is in Catalytic LogspaceAryan Agarwala, Ian MertzFOCS 2025 · 被引用 15 次
- Tree Evaluation Is in Space O(log n · log log n)James Cook, Ian MertzSTOC 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- Amortized Circuit Complexity, Formal Complexity Measures, and Catalytic AlgorithmsRobert Robere, Jeroen ZuiddamFOCS 2021 · 被引用 6 次
- Distinguishing, Predicting, and Certifying: On the Long Reach of Partial Notions of PseudorandomnessJiatu Li, Edward Pyne, Roei TellFOCS 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- Boosting Uniformity in Quasirandom Groups: Fast and SimpleHarm Derksen, Chin Ho Lee, Emanuele ViolaFOCS 2024 · 被引用 2 次
相关 Paper
- Simulating Time with Square-Root SpaceR. Ryan WilliamsSTOC 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Breaking the Cubic Barrier for (Unweighted) Tree Edit DistanceXiao MaoFOCS 2021 · 被引用 7 次
- Tight Space Complexity of the Coin ProblemMark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, Or ZamirFOCS 2021 · 被引用 5 次
- Team Correlated Equilibria in Zero-Sum Extensive-Form Games via Tree DecompositionsBrian Hu Zhang, Tuomas SandholmAAAI 2022 · 被引用 26 次
- Near-Optimal Derandomization of Medium-Width Branching ProgramsAaron (Louie) Putterman, Edward PyneSTOC 2023 · 被引用 3 次
