How Large Language Models are Transforming Machine-Paraphrase Plagiarism
Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Frederic Kirstein, Bela Gipp
摘要
The recent success of large language models for text generation poses a severe threat to academic integrity, as plagiarists can generate realistic paraphrases indistinguishable from original work. However, the role of large autoregressive models in generating machine-paraphrased plagiarism and their detection is still incipient in the literature. This work explores T5 and GPT3 for machine-paraphrase generation on scientific articles from arXiv, student theses, and Wikipedia. We evaluate the detection performance of six automated solutions and one commercial plagiarism detection software and perform a human study with 105 participants regarding their detection performance and the quality of generated examples. Our results suggest that large language models can rewrite text humans have difficulty identifying as machine-paraphrased (53% mean acc.). Human experts rate the quality of paraphrases generated by GPT-3 as high as original texts (clarity 4.0/5, fluency 4.2/5, coherence 3.8/5). The best-performing detection model (GPT-3) achieves 66% F1-score in detecting paraphrases. We make our code, data, and findings publicly available to facilitate the development of detection solutions.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Paraphrase Types for Generation and DetectionJan Philip Wahle, Bela Gipp, Terry RuasEMNLP 2023 · 被引用 7 次
- Does DetectGPT Fully Utilize Perturbation? Bridging Selective Perturbation to Fine-tuned Contrastive Learning Detector would be BetterShengchao Liu, Xiaoming Liu, Yichen Wang, Zehua Cheng 等ACL 2024 · 被引用 5 次
- Paraphrase Types Elicit Prompt Engineering CapabilitiesJan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Yang Xu, Bela GippEMNLP 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Reducing Sequence Length by Predicting Edit Spans with Large Language ModelsMasahiro Kaneko, Naoaki OkazakiEMNLP 2023 · 被引用 3 次
- Matching Pairs: Attributing Fine-Tuned Models to their Pre-Trained Large Language ModelsMyles Foley, Ambrish Rawat, Taesung Lee, Yufang Hou 等ACL 2023 · 被引用 2 次
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace 等EMNLP 2020 · 被引用 1,162 次
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 1,143 次
- S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research CorpusKyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Mark Neumann, Rodney Kinney 等ACL 2020 · 被引用 424 次
- With Little Power Comes Great ResponsibilityDallas Card, Peter Henderson, Urvashi Khandelwal, Robin Jia 等EMNLP 2020 · 被引用 76 次
- Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are FooledDaphne Ippolito, Daniel Duckworth, Chris Callison-Burch, Douglas EckACL 2020 · 被引用 21 次
相关 Paper
- AI Wrote My Paper and All I Got was This False Negative:* Measuring the Efficacy of Commercial AI Text DetectorsSeth Layton, Bernardo B. P. Medeiros, Kevin R. B. Butler, Patrick TraynorS&P 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defenseKalpesh Krishna, Yixiao Song, Marzena Karpinska, John Wieting 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 657 次
- An Empirical Study to Evaluate AIGC Detectors on Code ContentJian Wang, Shangqing Liu, Xiaofei Xie, Yi LiASE 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Enhancing LLM Text Detection with Retrieved Contexts and Logits Distribution ConsistencyZhaoheng Huang, Yutao Zhu, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2025
- People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated textJenna Russell, Marzena Karpinska, Mohit IyyerACL 2025 · 被引用 39 次
