Paradigm Shift of GNN Explainer from Label Space to Prototypical Representation Space
Jun Yin, Senzhang Wang, Ziluowen Luo, Peng Huo, Hao Yan, Hao Miao, Chaozhuo Li, Shirui Pan, Chengqi Zhang
摘要
Post-hoc instance-level graph neural network (GNN) explainers are developed to identify a compact subgraph (i.e., explanation) that encompasses the most influential components for each input graph. A fundamental limitation of existing methods lies in the insufficient utilization of structural information during GNN explainer optimization. They typically optimize the explainer by aligning the GNN predictions of input graph and its explanation in the graph label space which inherently lacks expressiveness to describe various graph structures. Motivated by the powerful structural expression ability of vectorized graph representations, we for the first time propose to shift the GNN explainer optimization from the graph label space to the graph representation space. However, the paradigm shift is challenging due to both the entanglement between the explanatory and non-explanatory substructures, and the distributional discrepancy between the input graph and the explanation subgraph. To this end, we meticulously design IDEA 1 , a universal dual-stage optimization framework grounded in a prototypical graph representation space, which can generalize across diverse existing GNN explainer architectures. Specifically, in the Structural Information Disentanglement stage, a graph tokenizer equipped with a structure-aware disentanglement objective is designed to disentangle the explanatory substructures and encapsulate them into explanatory prototypes. In the Explanatory Prototype Alignment stage, IDEA aligns the representational distributions of the input graph and its explanation unified in the prototypical representation space, to optimize the GNN explainer. Comprehensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of IDEA, with the average improvements of ROC-AUC by 4.45% and precision by 48.71%. We further integrate IDEA with diverse explainer architectures and achieve an improvement by up to 10.70%, which verifies its generalizability.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper21
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 35,902 次
- LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for RecommendationXiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li 等SIGIR 2020 · 被引用 4,448 次
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 3,935 次
- InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information MaximizationFan-Yun Sun, Jordan Hoffmann, Vikas Verma, Jian TangICLR 2020 · 被引用 1,010 次
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 888 次
相关 Paper
- Empower Post-hoc Graph Explanations with Information Bottleneck: A Pre-training and Fine-tuning PerspectiveJihong Wang, Minnan Luo, Jundong Li, Yun Lin 等KDD 2023 · 被引用 5 次
- ProtGNN: Towards Self-Explaining Graph Neural NetworksZaixi Zhang, Qi Liu, Hao Wang, Chengqiang Lu 等AAAI 2022 · 被引用 173 次
- Self-Interpretable Subgraph Neural Network with Deep Reinforcement Walk ExplorationJianming Huang, Hiroyuki KasaiAAAI 2026
- Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksCaihua Shan, Yifei Shen, Yao Zhang, Xiang Li 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 81 次
- Multi-scale Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksLutong Wu, Shiying Cheng, Zhiqiang Wang, Jianqing Liang 等ICML 2026
