DSGym: A Standardized and Holistic Framework for Evaluating and Training Data Science Agents
Fan Nie, Junlin Wang, Harper Hua, Federico Bianchi, Yongchan Kwon, Zhenting Qi, Owen Queen, Shang Zhu, James Zou
摘要
Data science agents promise to accelerate discovery and insight-generation by turning data into executable analyses and findings. Yet existing data science benchmarks fall short due to fragmented evaluation interfaces that make cross-benchmark comparison difficult, narrow task coverage and a lack of rigorous data grounding. In particular, we show that a substantial portion of tasks in current benchmarks can be solved without using the actual data. To address these limitations, we introduce DSGym, a standardized framework for evaluating and training data science agents in self-contained execution environments. Unlike static benchmarks, DSGym provides a modular architecture that makes it easy to add tasks, agent scaffolds, and tools, positioning it as a live, extensible testbed. We curate DSGym-Tasks, a holistic task suite that standardizes and refines existing benchmarks via quality and shortcut solvability filtering. We further expand coverage with (1) DSBio: expert-derived bioinformatics tasks grounded in literature and (2) DSPredict: challenging prediction tasks spanning domains such as computer vision, molecular prediction, and single-cell perturbation. Beyond evaluation, DSGym enables agent training via execution-verified data synthesis pipeline. As a case study, we build a 2,000-example training set and trained a 4B model in DSGym that outperforms GPT-4o on standardized analysis benchmarks. Overall, DSGym enables rigorous end-to-end measurement of whether agents can plan, implement, and validate data Figure 1: (a) In the typical scientific discovery process, DSGym specifically focuses on the Data-Driven Investigation phase, where agents must bridge scientific hypotheses and empirical evidence through complex analysis. (b) We provide a unified environment spanning 10+ scientific domains and diverse file types. The framework enables a closed-loop ecosystem for both evaluation and training.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper8
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 504 次
- Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM AgentsXingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Yizhe Zhang 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 436 次
- MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning ExperimentationQian Huang, Jian Vora, Percy Liang, Jure LeskovecICML 2024 · 被引用 209 次
- Scaling Generalist Data-Analytic AgentsShuofei Qiao, Yanqiu Zhao, Zhisong Qiu, Xiaobin Wang 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 12 次
- MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning EngineeringJun Shern Chan, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe, James Aung 等ICLR 2025 · 被引用 9 次
相关 Paper
- DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao 等ICLR 2025
- ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific DiscoveryZiru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang 等ICLR 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- SciAgentGym: Benchmarking Multi-Step Scientific Tool-Use in LLM AgentsYujiong Shen, Yajie Yang, Zhiheng Xi, Binze Hu 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- InnovatorBench: Evaluating Agents' Ability to Conduct Innovative AI ResearchYunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Weiye Si, Zhen Huang 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 9 次
- DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsYiming Huang, Jianwen Luo, Yan Yu, Yitong Zhang 等EMNLP 2024 · 被引用 7 次
