Strategic Facility Location with Clients That Minimize Total Waiting Time
Simon Krogmann, Pascal Lenzner, Alexander Skopalik
摘要
We study a non-cooperative two-sided facility location game in which facilities and clients behave strategically. This is in contrast to many other facility location games in which clients simply visit their closest facility. Facility agents select a location on a graph to open a facility to attract as much purchasing power as possible, while client agents choose which facilities to patronize by strategically distributing their purchasing power in order to minimize their total waiting time. Here, the waiting time of a facility depends on its received total purchasing power. We show that our client stage is an atomic splittable congestion game, which implies existence, uniqueness and efficient computation of a client equilibrium. Therefore, facility agents can efficiently predict client behavior and make strategic decisions accordingly. Despite that, we prove that subgame perfect equilibria do not exist in all instances of this game and that their existence is NP-hard to decide. On the positive side, we provide a simple and efficient algorithm to compute 3-approximate subgame perfect equilibria.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Facility Location Games with Entrance FeesMengfan Ma, Mingyu Xiao, Tian Bai, Bakh KhoussainovAAAI 2023 · 被引用 4 次
- Facility Location for Congesting Commuters and Generalizing the Cost-Distance ProblemThanasis Lianeas, Marios Mertzanidis, Aikaterini NikolidakiAAAI 2026
- Facility Location Games with Optional Preferences: A RevisitXingchen Sha, Shuyu Bao, Hau Chan, Vincent Chau 等AAAI 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Facility's Perspective to Fair Facility Location ProblemsChenhao Wang, Xiaoying Wu, Minming Li, Hau ChanAAAI 2021 · 被引用 9 次
- Multi-Leader Congestion Games with an AdversaryTobias Harks, Mona Henle, Max Klimm, Jannik Matuschke 等AAAI 2022 · 被引用 4 次
