Interpretable Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders: A Data Analysis Toolkit
Nick Jiang, Xiaoqing Sun, Lisa Dunlap, Lewis Smith, Neel Nanda
摘要
Analyzing large-scale text corpora is a core challenge in machine learning, crucial for tasks like identifying undesirable model behaviors. Current methods often rely on costly LLM-based techniques (e.g. annotating dataset differences) or dense embedding models (e.g. for clustering), which lack control over the properties of interest. We propose using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to create SAE embeddings : representations whose dimensions map to interpretable concepts. Through four data analysis tasks, we show that SAE embeddings are more cost-effective and reliable than LLMs and offer the controllability that dense embeddings lack. Using the large hypothesis space of SAEs, we can uncover insights such as (1) semantic differences between datasets and (2) unexpected concept correlations in documents. For instance, by comparing model responses, we find that Grok-4 clarifies ambiguities more often than nine other frontier models. Relative to LLMs, SAE embeddings uncover bigger differences at 2-8x lower cost and identify biases more reliably. Additionally, SAE embeddings are controllable: by filtering concepts, we can (3) cluster documents along axes of interest and (4) outperform dense embeddings on property-based retrieval. Using SAE embeddings, we study model behavior with two case studies: investigating how OpenAI model behavior has changed over time and finding "trigger" phrases learned by Tulu-3 (Lambert et al., 2024) from its training data. These results position SAEs as a versatile tool for unstructured data analysis and highlight the neglected importance of interpreting models through their data .
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- What's In My Human Feedback? Learning Interpretable Descriptions of Preference DataRajiv Movva, Smitha Milli, Sewon Min, Emma PiersonICLR 2026 · 被引用 27 次
- Sparse Autoencoders are Topic ModelsLeander Girrbach, Zeynep AkataICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Automatically Finding Reward Model BiasesAtticus Wang, Iván Arcuschin, Arthur ConmyICML 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Language Model Circuits Are Sparse in the Neuron BasisAryaman Arora, Zhengxuan Wu, Jacob Steinhardt, Sarah SchwettmannICML 2026
- RouterInterp: Understanding Superposed Specialisation in Mixture of Experts RoutingIlya Lasy, Nora Cai, Kola AyonrindeICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper12
- LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation DatasetLianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 419 次
- Goal Driven Discovery of Distributional Differences via Language DescriptionsRuiqi Zhong, Peter Zhang, Steve Li, Jinwoo Ahn 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 81 次
- DocETL: Agentic Query Rewriting and Evaluation for Complex Document ProcessingShreya Shankar, Tristan Chambers, Tarak Shah, Aditya G. Parameswaran 等VLDB 2025 · 被引用 62 次
- Describing Differences between Text Distributions with Natural LanguageRuiqi Zhong, Charlie Snell, Dan Klein, Jacob SteinhardtICML 2022 · 被引用 61 次
- The POLAR Framework: Polar Opposites Enable Interpretability of Pre-Trained Word EmbeddingsBinny Mathew, Sandipan Sikdar, Florian Lemmerich, Markus StrohmaierWWW 2020 · 被引用 40 次
相关 Paper
- Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse ProbingSubhash Kantamneni, Joshua Engels, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Max Tegmark 等ICML 2025
- ConceptViz: A Visual Analytics Approach for Exploring Concepts in Large Language ModelsHaoxuan Li, Zhen Wen, Qiqi Jiang, Chenxiao Li 等IEEE VIS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Step-Level Sparse Autoencoder for Reasoning Process InterpretationXuan Yang, Jiayu Liu, Yuhang Lai, Hao Xu 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
- Learning Retrieval Models with Sparse AutoencodersThibault Formal, Maxime Louis, Hervé Déjean, Stéphane ClinchantICLR 2026 · 被引用 9 次
