A fine-grained computational interpretation of Girard's intuitionistic proof-nets
Delia Kesner
摘要
This paper introduces a functional term calculus, called pn, that captures the essence of the operational semantics of Intuitionistic Linear Logic Proof-Nets with a faithful degree of granularity, both statically and dynamically. On the static side, we identify an equivalence relation on pn-terms which is sound and complete with respect to the classical notion of structural equivalence for proof-nets. On the dynamic side, we show that every single (exponential) step in the term calculus translates to a different single (exponential) step in the graphical formalism, thus capturing the original Girard’s granularity of proof-nets but on the level of terms. We also show some fundamental properties of the calculus such as confluence, strong normalization, preservation of β-strong normalization and the existence of a strong bisimulation that captures pairs of pn-terms having the same graph reduction.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- Pushdown Normal-Form Bisimulation: A Nominal Context-Free Approach to Program EquivalenceVasileios Koutavas, Yu-Yang Lin, Nikos TzevelekosLICS 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Higher Order Bayesian Networks, ExactlyClaudia Faggian, Daniele Pautasso, Gabriele VanoniPOPL 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Fully Abstract Normal Form Bisimulation for Call-by-Value PCFVasileios Koutavas, Yu-Yang Lin, Nikos TzevelekosLICS 2023 · 被引用 8 次
- Why Are Proofs Relevant in Proof-Relevant Models?Axel Kerinec, Giulio Manzonetto, Federico OlimpieriPOPL 2023 · 被引用 6 次
- Bialgebraic Reasoning on Higher-order Program EquivalenceSergey Goncharov, Stefan Milius, Stelios Tsampas, Henning UrbatLICS 2024 · 被引用 4 次
