What and When to Explain?: On-road Evaluation of Explanations in Highly Automated Vehicles
Gwangbin Kim, Dohyeon Yeo, Taewoo Jo, Daniela Rus, Seungjun Kim
摘要
Explanations in automated vehicles help passengers understand the vehicle's state and capabilities, leading to increased trust in the technology. Specifically, for passengers of SAE Level 4 and 5 vehicles who are not engaged in the driving process, the enhanced sense of control provided by explanations reduces potential anxieties, enabling them to fully leverage the benefits of automation. To construct explanations that enhance trust and situational awareness without disturbing passengers, we suggest testing with people who ultimately employ such explanations, ideally under real-world driving conditions. In this study, we examined the impact of various visual explanation types (perception, attention, perception+attention) and timing mechanisms (constantly provided or only under risky scenarios) on passenger experience under naturalistic driving scenarios using actual vehicles with mixed-reality support. Our findings indicate that visualizing the vehicle's perception state improves the perceived usability, trust, safety, and situational awareness without adding cognitive burden, even without explaining the underlying causes. We also demonstrate that the traffic risk probability could be used to control the timing of an explanation delivery, particularly when passengers are overwhelmed with information. Our study's on-road evaluation method offers a safe and reliable testing environment and can be easily customized for other AI models and explanation modalities.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper8
- What Did My Car Say? Impact of Autonomous Vehicle Explanation Errors and Driving Context On Comfort, Reliance, Satisfaction, and Driving ConfidenceRobert A. Kaufman, Aaron Broukhim, David Kirsh, Nadir WeibelCHI 2025 · 被引用 12 次
- You're the One Whom I'm Talking To: The Role of Contextual External Human-Machine Interfaces in Multi-Road User Conflict ScenariosYumin Kang, Jeongju Park, Seokhyun Hwang, Minwoo Seong 等UbiComp 2025 · 被引用 7 次
- Fly Away: Evaluating the Impact of Motion Fidelity on Optimized User Interface Design via Bayesian Optimization in Automated Urban Air Mobility SimulationsLuca-Maxim Meinhardt, Clara Schramm, Pascal Jansen, Mark Colley 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- From Awareness to Intent: Mitigating Silent Driving System Failures through Prospective Situation Awareness Enhancing InterfacesJiyao Wang, Song Yan, Xiao Yang, Qihang He 等CHI 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- What Do People Want to Know about Artificial Intelligence (AI)? The Importance of Answering End-user Questions to Explain Autonomous Vehicle (AV) DecisionsSomayeh Molaei, Lionel Peter Robert, Nikola BanovicCSCW 2025 · 被引用 2 次
相关 Paper
- Effects of Scene Detection, Scene Prediction, and Maneuver Planning Visualizations on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load in Highly Automated VehiclesMark Colley, Max Rädler, Jonas Glimmann, Enrico RukzioUbiComp 2022 · 被引用 66 次
- How Should Automated Vehicles Communicate Critical Situations?: A Comparative Analysis of Visualization ConceptsMark Colley, Svenja Krauss, Mirjam Lanzer, Enrico RukzioUbiComp 2021 · 被引用 57 次
- TimelyTale: A Multimodal Dataset Approach to Assessing Passengers' Explanation Demands in Highly Automated VehiclesGwangbin Kim, Seokhyun Hwang, Minwoo Seong, Dohyeon Yeo 等UbiComp 2024 · 被引用 13 次
- Effects of Semantic Segmentation Visualization on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load in Highly Automated VehiclesMark Colley, Benjamin Eder, Jan Ole Rixen, Enrico RukzioCHI 2021 · 被引用 100 次
- Decoding Driver Intention Cues: Exploring Non-verbal Communication for Human-Centered Automotive InterfacesMohammad Faramarzian, Jorge Pardo, Ilan Mandel, Andry Rakotonirainy 等CHI 2025 · 被引用 3 次
