Analysis of the Telegram Key Exchange
Martin R. Albrecht, Lenka Mareková, Kenneth G. Paterson, Eyal Ronen, Igors Stepanovs
摘要
We describe, formally model, and prove the security of Telegram's key exchange protocols for client-server communications. To achieve this, we develop a suitable multi-stage key exchange security model along with pseudocode descriptions of the Telegram protocols that are based on analysis of Telegram's specifications and client source code. We carefully document how our descriptions differ from reality and justify our modelling choices. Our security proofs reduce the security of the protocols to that of their cryptographic building blocks, but the subsequent analysis of those building blocks requires the introduction of a number of novel security assumptions, reflecting many design decisions made by Telegram that are suboptimal from the perspective of formal analysis. Along the way, we provide a proof of IND-CCA security for the variant of RSA-OEAP+ used in Telegram and identify a hypothetical attack exploiting current Telegram server behaviour (which is not captured in our protocol descriptions). Finally, we reflect on the broader lessons about protocol design that can be taken from our work.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
相关 Paper
- Four Attacks and a Proof for TelegramMartin R. Albrecht, Lenka Mareková, Kenneth G. Paterson, Igors StepanovsS&P 2022 · 被引用 40 次
- TreeKEM: A Modular Machine-Checked Symbolic Security Analysis of Group Key Agreement in Messaging Layer SecurityThéophile Wallez, Jonathan Protzenko, Karthikeyan BhargavanS&P 2025
- Automated Formal Analysis of Signal's Double Ratchet: Attacks, Fixes and Security ProofsVincent Cheval, Charlie Jacomme, Jessica RichardsS&P 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- Component-Based Formal Analysis of 5G-AKA: Channel Assumptions and Session ConfusionCas Cremers, Martin Dehnel-WildNDSS 2019 · 被引用 131 次
- Three Lessons From Threema: Analysis of a Secure MessengerKenneth G. Paterson, Matteo Scarlata, Kien Tuong TruongUSENIX Security 2023
