Learning Large DAGs is Harder than you Think: Many Losses are Minimal for the Wrong DAG
Jonas Seng, Matej Zecevic, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting
摘要
Structure learning is a crucial task in science, especially in fields such as medicine and biology, where the wrong identification of (in)dependencies among random variables can have significant implications. The primary objective of structure learning is to learn a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) that represents the underlying probability distribution of the data. Many prominent DAG learners rely on least square losses or log-likelihood losses for optimization. It is well-known from regression models that least square losses are heavily influenced by the scale of the variables. Recently it has been demonstrated that the scale of data also affects performance of structure learning algorithms, though with a strong focus on linear 2-node systems and simulated data. Moving beyond these results, we provide conditions under which square-based losses are minimal for wrong DAGs in ddimensional cases. Furthermore, we also show that scale can impair performance of structure learners if relations among variables are non-linear for both square based and log-likelihood based losses. We confirm our theoretical findings through extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world data.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper3
- Markov Equivalence and Consistency in Differentiable Structure LearningChang Deng, Kevin Bello, Pradeep Ravikumar, Bryon AragamNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 8 次
- Standardizing Structural Causal ModelsWeronika Ormaniec, Scott Sussex, Lars Lorch, Bernhard Schölkopf 等ICLR 2025
- Differentiable Structure Learning and Causal Discovery for General Binary DataChang Deng, Bryon AragamNeurIPS 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper5
- Gradient-Based Neural DAG LearningSébastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, Simon Lacoste-JulienICLR 2020 · 被引用 337 次
- Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy to GameAlexander G. Reisach, Christof Seiler, Sebastian WeichwaldNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 213 次
- DiBS: Differentiable Bayesian Structure LearningLars Lorch, Jonas Rothfuss, Bernhard Schölkopf, Andreas KrauseNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 144 次
- DAGs with No Fears: A Closer Look at Continuous Optimization for Learning Bayesian NetworksDennis Wei, Tian Gao, Yue YuNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 102 次
- Truncated Matrix Power Iteration for Differentiable DAG LearningZhen Zhang, Ignavier Ng, Dong Gong, Yuhang Liu 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 36 次
相关 Paper
- On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGsIgnavier Ng, AmirEmad Ghassami, Kun ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 306 次
- Learning Large DAGs by Combining Continuous Optimization and Feedback Arc Set HeuristicsPierre Gillot, Pekka ParviainenAAAI 2022 · 被引用 5 次
- Effective Causal Discovery under Identifiable Heteroscedastic Noise ModelNaiyu Yin, Tian Gao, Yue Yu, Qiang JiAAAI 2024 · 被引用 5 次
- ProDAG: Projected Variational Inference for Directed Acyclic GraphsRyan Thompson, Edwin V. Bonilla, Robert KohnNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- CASTLE: Regularization via Auxiliary Causal Graph DiscoveryTrent Kyono, Yao Zhang, Mihaela van der SchaarNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 82 次
