Post-Quantum Zero Knowledge, Revisited or: How to Do Quantum Rewinding Undetectably
Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, Nicholas Spooner
摘要
A major difficulty in quantum rewinding is the fact that measurement is destructive: extracting information from a quantum state irreversibly changes it. This is especially problematic in the context of zero-knowledge simulation, where preserving the adversary's state is essential.
In this work, we develop new techniques for quantum rewinding in the context of extraction and zero-knowledge simulation:
-
We show how to extract information from a quantum adversary by rewinding it without disturbing its internal state. We use this technique to prove that important interactive protocols, such as the Goldreich-Micali-Wigderson protocol for graph non-isomorphism and the Feige-Shamir protocol for NP, are zero-knowledge against quantum adversaries.
-
We prove that the Goldreich-Kahan protocol for NP is post-quantum zero knowledge using a simulator that can be seen as a natural quantum extension of the classical simulator.
Our results achieve (constant-round) black-box zero-knowledge with negligible simulation error, appearing to contradict a recent impossibility result due to Chia-Chung-Liu-Yamakawa (FOCS 2021). This brings us to our final contribution: 3. We introduce coherent-runtime expected quantum polynomial time, a computational model that (1) captures all of our zero-knowledge simulators, (2) cannot break any polynomial hardness assumptions, and (3) is not subject to the CCLY impossibility. In light of our positive results and the CCLY negative results, we propose coherent-runtime simulation to be the right quantum analogue of classical expected polynomial-time simulation.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper13
- Obfuscation of Pseudo-Deterministic Quantum CircuitsJames Bartusek, Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Takashi YamakawaSTOC 2023 · 被引用 23 次
- Commitments to Quantum StatesSam Gunn, Nathan Ju, Fermi Ma, Mark ZhandrySTOC 2023 · 被引用 16 次
- Succinct Classical Verification of Quantum ComputationJames Bartusek, Yael Tauman Kalai, Alex Lombardi, Fermi Ma 等CRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 12 次
- Post-quantum Simulatable Extraction with Minimal Assumptions: Black-Box and Constant-RoundNai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Xiao Liang, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 8 次
- Succinct Arguments for QMA from Standard Assumptions via Compiled Nonlocal GamesTony Metger, Anand Natarajan, Tina ZhangFOCS 2024 · 被引用 8 次
它引用的顶会 Paper6
- One-Way Functions Imply Secure Computation in a Quantum WorldJames Bartusek, Andrea Coladangelo, Dakshita Khurana, Fermi MaCRYPTO 2021 · 被引用 57 次
- Oblivious Transfer Is in MiniQCryptAlex B. Grilo, Huijia Lin, Fang Song, Vinod VaikuntanathanEUROCRYPT 2021 · 被引用 56 次
- Post-quantum zero knowledge in constant roundsNir Bitansky, Omri ShmueliSTOC 2020 · 被引用 47 次
- Post-Quantum Succinct Arguments: Breaking the Quantum Rewinding BarrierAlessandro Chiesa, Fermi Ma, Nicholas Spooner, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2021 · 被引用 30 次
- A Black-Box Approach to Post-Quantum Zero-Knowledge in Constant RoundsNai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2021 · 被引用 16 次
相关 Paper
- On the Concurrent Composition of Quantum Zero-KnowledgePrabhanjan Ananth, Kai-Min Chung, Rolando L. La PlacaCRYPTO 2021 · 被引用 8 次
- On Concurrent Multi-party Quantum ComputationVipul Goyal, Xiao Liang, Giulio MalavoltaCRYPTO 2023 · 被引用 4 次
- The Black-Box Simulation Barrier Persists in a Fully Quantum WorldNai-Hui Chia, Kai-Min Chung, Xiao Liang, Jiahui LiuEUROCRYPT 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Classical Proofs of Quantum KnowledgeThomas Vidick, Tina ZhangEUROCRYPT 2021 · 被引用 19 次
- Fiat-Shamir via list-recoverable codes (or: parallel repetition of GMW is not zero-knowledge)Justin Holmgren, Alex Lombardi, Ron D. RothblumSTOC 2021
