Extracting alignment data in open models
Federico Barbero, Xiangming Gu, Christopher A. Choquette Choo, Chawin Sitawarin, Matthew Jagielski, Itay Yona, Petar Veličković, Ilia Shumailov, Jamie Hayes
摘要
Work performed while the author was at Google DeepMind, ** Now at OpenAI In this work, we show that it is possible to extract significant amounts of alignment training data from a post-trained model -useful to steer the model to improve certain capabilities such as long-context reasoning, safety, instruction following, and maths. While the majority of related work on memorisation has focused on measuring success of training data extraction through string matching, we argue that embedding models are better suited for our specific goals. Distances measured through a high quality embedding model can identify semantic similarities between strings that a different metric such as edit distance will struggle to capture. In fact, in our investigation, approximate string matching would have severely undercounted (by a conservative estimate of 10×) the amount of data that can be extracted due to trivial artifacts that deflate the metric. Interestingly, we find that models readily regurgitate training data that was used in post-training phases such as SFT or RL. We show that this data can be then used to train a base model, recovering a meaningful amount of the original performance. We believe our work exposes a possibly overlooked risk towards extracting alignment data. Finally, our work opens up an interesting discussion on the downstream effects of distillation practices: since models seem to be regurgitating aspects of their training set, distillation can therefore be thought of as indirectly training on the model's original dataset. This paper only considers and discusses open models. Introduction Progress in capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is frequently driven by improvements to training data recipes. It is common for a model developer to curate smaller and targeted data bundles to push performance on particular downstream benchmarks. For the purpose of this work, we refer to this data as 'alignment' data. We use the term broadly to encompass not only data used for safety and instruction-following (such as Supervised Finetuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) datasets), but also any targeted data collections used to steer model behaviour and enhance specific capabilities, including mathematics, reasoning, and long-context understanding. While this type of data is usually found in post-training, it is becoming increasingly common to include it also earlier in training (Meta, 2025) . We use the term alignment rather than post-training in our work for this reason. The fact that models memorise subsets of their training data is now a well-established phenomenon (
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Beyond Indistinguishability: Measuring Extraction Risk in LLM APIsRuixuan Liu, David Evans, Li XiongS&P 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Private Direct Preference Optimization for LLM AlignmentYangfan Jiang, Fei Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao 等CCS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 2,866 次
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 2,039 次
相关 Paper
- Scalable Extraction of Training Data from Aligned, Production Language ModelsMilad Nasr, Javier Rando, Nicholas Carlini, Jonathan Hayase 等ICLR 2025
- Retracing the Past: LLMs Emit Training Data When They Get LostMyeongseob Ko, Nikhil Reddy Billa, Adam Nguyen, Charles Fleming 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Alignment at Pre-training! Towards Native Alignment for Arabic LLMsJuhao Liang, Zhenyang Cai, Jianqing Zhu, Huang Huang 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 19 次
- Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models May Backfire!Zhanhui Zhou, Jie Liu, Zhichen Dong, Jiaheng Liu 等ACL 2024
- In-Training Defenses Against Emergent Misalignment in Language ModelsDavid Kaczér, Magnus Jørgenvåg, Clemens Vetter, Esha Afzal 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 13 次
