Green AI: Do Deep Learning Frameworks Have Different Costs?
Stefanos Georgiou, Maria Kechagia, Tushar Sharma, Federica Sarro, Ying Zou
摘要
The use of Artificial Intelligence (ai), and more specifically of Deep Learning (dl), in modern software systems, is nowadays widespread and continues to grow. At the same time, its usage is energy demanding and contributes to the increased CO 2 emissions, and has a great financial cost as well. Even though there are many studies that examine the capabilities of dl, only a few focus on its green aspects, such as energy consumption. This paper aims at raising awareness of the costs incurred when using different dl frameworks. To this end, we perform a thorough empirical study to measure and compare the energy consumption and run-time performance of six different dl models written in the two most popular dl frameworks, namely PyTorch and TensorFlow. We use a well-known benchmark of dl models, DeepLearningExamples, created by nvidia, to compare both the training and inference costs of dl. Finally, we manually investigate the functions of these frameworks that took most of the time to execute in our experiments. The results of our empirical study reveal that there is a statistically significant difference between the cost incurred by the two dl frameworks in 94% of the cases studied. While TensorFlow achieves significantly better energy and run-time performance than PyTorch, and with large effect sizes in 100% of the cases for the training phase, PyTorch instead exhibits significantly better energy and run-time performance than TensorFlow in the inference phase for 66% of the cases, always, with large effect sizes. Such a large difference in performance costs does not, however, seem to affect the accuracy of the models produced, as both frameworks achieve comparable scores under the same configurations. Our manual analysis, of the documentation and source code of the functions examined, reveals that such a difference in performance costs is under-documented, in these frameworks. This suggests that developers need to improve the documentation of their dl frameworks, the source code of the functions used in these frameworks, as well as to enhance existing dl algorithms.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- It's Not Easy Being Green: On the Energy Efficiency of Programming LanguagesNicolas van Kempen, Hyuk-Je Kwon, Dung Tuan Nguyen, Emery D. BergerASE 2025 · 被引用 8 次
- Can Machine Learning Pipelines Be Better Configured?Yibo Wang, Ying Wang, Tingwei Zhang, Yue Yu 等FSE 2023 · 被引用 4 次
- Diversity Drives Fairness: Ensemble of Higher Order Mutants for Intersectional Fairness of Machine Learning SoftwareZhenpeng Chen, Xinyue Li, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- SustainDiffusion: Optimising the Social and Environmental Sustainability of Stable Diffusion ModelsGiordano d’Aloisio, Tosin Fadahunsi, Jay Choy, Rebecca Moussa 等ICSE 2026
- Energy Considerations of Large Language Model Inference and Efficiency OptimizationsJared Fernandez, Clara Na, Vashisth Tiwari, Yonatan Bisk 等ACL 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Tensor-Aware Energy AccountingTimur Babakol, Yu David LiuICSE 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Taxonomy of real faults in deep learning systemsNargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Gabriele Bavota, Vincenzo Riccio 等ICSE 2020 · 被引用 281 次
- The Hidden Joules: Evaluating the Energy Consumption of Vision Backbones for Progress Towards More Efficient Model InferenceZeyu Yang, Wesley ArmourICML 2025
- Understanding performance problems in deep learning systemsJunming Cao, Bihuan Chen, Chao Sun, Longjie Hu 等FSE 2022 · 被引用 33 次
- An Exploratory Study of Deep learning Supply ChainXin Tan, Kai Gao, Minghui Zhou, Li ZhangICSE 2022 · 被引用 32 次
