Lune

ICML2020顶会

Naive Exploration is Optimal for Online LQR

Max Simchowitz, Dylan J. Foster

2020年份
209被引次数
53顶会引用

摘要

We consider the problem of online adaptive control of the linear quadratic regulator, where the true system parameters are unknown. We prove new upper and lower bounds demonstrating that the optimal regret scales as Θ~(du2dxT)\widetilde{\Theta}({\sqrt{d_{\mathbf{u}}^2 d_{\mathbf{x}} T}}), where TT is the number of time steps, dud_{\mathbf{u}} is the dimension of the input space, and dxd_{\mathbf{x}} is the dimension of the system state. Notably, our lower bounds rule out the possibility of a poly(log⁡T)\mathrm{poly}(\log{}T)-regret algorithm, which had been conjectured due to the apparent strong convexity of the problem. Our upper bound is attained by a simple variant of certainty equivalent control\textit{certainty equivalent control}, where the learner selects control inputs according to the optimal controller for their estimate of the system while injecting exploratory random noise. While this approach was shown to achieve T\sqrt{T}-regret by (Mania et al. 2019), we show that if the learner continually refines their estimates of the system matrices, the method attains optimal dimension dependence as well. Central to our upper and lower bounds is a new approach for controlling perturbations of Riccati equations called the self-bounding ODE method\textit{self-bounding ODE method}, which we use to derive suboptimality bounds for the certainty equivalent controller synthesized from estimated system dynamics. This in turn enables regret upper bounds which hold for any stabilizable instance\textit{any stabilizable instance} and scale with natural control-theoretic quantities.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

lune papers fulltext 37f59e23-04bd-4faf-a67f-2f2bc3211998

引用它的顶会 Paper53

问问它们各自怎么用它

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖