LLM-based Typed Hyperresolution for Commonsense Reasoning with Knowledge Bases
Armin Toroghi, Ali Pesaranghader, Tanmana Sadhu, Scott Sanner
摘要
Large language models (LLM) are being increasingly applied to tasks requiring commonsense reasoning. Despite their outstanding potential, the reasoning process of LLMs is prone to errors and hallucinations that hinder their applicability, especially in high-stakes scenarios. Several works have attempted to enhance commonsense reasoning performance of LLMs by (i) using prompting styles that elicit more accurate reasoning, (ii) utilizing the LLM as a semantic parser for a symbolic reasoner, or (iii) enforcing the LLM to simulate a logical inference rule. However, all these solutions have critical limitations: they are unable to leverage the internal commonsense knowledge of the LLM in tandem with an axiomatic knowledge base, they lack a mechanism to reliably repair erroneous inference steps, and their application is restricted to small knowledge bases that fit the context limit of the LLM. In this work, we present LLM-based Typed Hyperresolution (LLM-TH), a logical commonsense reasoning framework that leverages "theory resolution", a concept from classical logical inference which enables integrating LLMs into the "resolution" inference rule, thus mitigating reasoning errors and hallucinations and enabling verification of the reasoning procedure. LLM-TH is also equipped with a mechanism for repairing erroneous inference steps supported by theoretical guarantees. Using "Hyperresolution" and "Typed inference" schemes, we show that LLM-TH can efficiently reason over large knowledge bases consisting of tens of thousands of rules with arbitrary predicate arities. Our experiments on three diverse language-based reasoning tasks-preference reasoning, multi-domain deductive reasoning, and geographical question answering-showcase that LLM-TH, using merely a BART 406M parameter NLI entailment model, significantly reduces reasoning errors compared to baselines using Llama3-70B, Gemini1.5-Flash,
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper22
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 19,162 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 2,916 次
相关 Paper
- Verifiable, Debuggable, and Repairable Commonsense Logical Reasoning via LLM-based Theory ResolutionArmin Toroghi, Willis Guo, Ali Pesaranghader, Scott SannerEMNLP 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical ReasoningAntonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, Irina HigginsICLR 2023 · 被引用 110 次
- HalluClean: A Unified Framework to Combat Hallucinations in LLMsYaxin Zhao, Yu ZhangAAAI 2026
- GER-LLM: Efficient and Effective Geospatial Entity Resolution with Large Language ModelHaojia Zhu, Zhicheng Li, Jiahui JinEMNLP 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Beyond Correctness: Exposing LLM-generated Logical Flaws in Reasoning via Multi-step Automated Theorem ProvingXinyi Zheng, Ningke Li, Xiaokun Luan, Wang Kailong 等ICSE 2026
