AlphaBeta is not as good as you think: a simple class of synthetic games for a better analysis of deterministic game-solving algorithms
Raphaël Boige, Amine M. Boumaza, Bruno Scherrer
摘要
Deterministic game-solving algorithms are conventionally analyzed in the light of their average-case complexity against a distribution of random game-trees, where leaf values are independently sampled from a fixed distribution. This simplified model enables uncluttered mathematical analysis, revealing two key properties: root value distributions asymptotically collapse to a single fixed value for finite-valued trees, and all reasonable algorithms achieve global optimality. However, these findings are artifacts of the model's design: its long criticized independence assumption strips games of structural complexity, producing trivial instances where no algorithm faces meaningful challenges. To address this limitation, we introduce a class of synthetic games generated by a probabilistic model that incrementally constructs game-trees using a fixed level-wise conditional distribution. By enforcing ancestor dependencies, a critical structural feature of real-world games, our framework generates problems with adjustable difficulty while retaining some form of analytical tractability. For several algorithms, including AlphaBeta and Scout, we derive recursive formulas characterizing their average-case complexities under this model. These allow us to rigorously compare algorithms on deep game-trees, where Monte-Carlo simulations are no longer feasible. While asymptotically, all algorithms seem to converge to identical branching factor (a result analogous to that of independence-based models), deep finite trees reveal stark differences: AlphaBeta incurs a significantly larger constant multiplicative factor compared to algorithms like Scout, leading to a substantial practical slowdown. Our framework sheds new light on classical game-solving algorithms, offering rigorous evidence and analytical tools to advance the understanding of these methods under a richer, more challenging, and yet tractable model.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
相关 Paper
- Accelerating Monte Carlo Tree Search with Probability Tree State AbstractionYangqing Fu, Ming Sun, Buqing Nie, Yue GaoNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5 次
- Efficient Bayesian network structure learning via local Markov boundary searchMing Gao, Bryon AragamNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 20 次
- Blossom: an Anytime Algorithm for Computing Optimal Decision TreesEmir Demirovic, Emmanuel Hebrard, Louis JeanICML 2023 · 被引用 11 次
- Policy improvement by planning with GumbelIvo Danihelka, Arthur Guez, Julian Schrittwieser, David SilverICLR 2022 · 被引用 84 次
- Epistemic Monte Carlo Tree SearchYaniv Oren, Viliam Vadocz, Matthijs T. J. Spaan, Wendelin BoehmerICLR 2025
