PLAN-TUNING: Post-Training Language Models to Learn Step-by-Step Planning for Complex Problem Solving
Mihir Parmar, Palash Goyal, Xin Liu, Yiwen Song, Mingyang Ling, Chitta Baral, Hamid Palangi, Tomas Pfister
摘要
Recently, decomposing complex problems into simple subtasks-a crucial part of human-like natural planning-to solve the given problem has significantly boosted the performance of large language models (LLMs). However, leveraging such planning structures during post-training to boost the performance of smaller open-source LLMs remains underexplored. Motivated by this, we introduce PLAN-TUNING, a unified post-training framework that (i) distills synthetic task decompositions (termed "planning trajectories") from largescale LLMs and (ii) fine-tunes smaller models via supervised and reinforcement-learning objectives designed to mimic these planning processes to improve complex reasoning. On GSM8k and the MATH benchmarks, plantuned models outperform strong baselines by an average ∼ 7%. Furthermore, plan-tuned models show better generalization capabilities on out-of-domain datasets, with average ∼ 10% and ∼ 12% performance improvements on OlympiadBench and AIME 2024, respectively. Our detailed analysis demonstrates how planning trajectories improves complex reasoning capabilities, showing that PLAN-TUNING is an effective strategy for improving task-specific performance of smaller LLMs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper9
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 8,168 次
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 681 次
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu 等ACL 2023 · 被引用 249 次
- Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language ModelsHaoxiang Sun, Yingqian Min, Zhipeng Chen, Xin Zhao 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 53 次
相关 Paper
- Rethinking LLM Reasoning: From Explicit Trajectories to Latent RepresentationsCong Jiang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Fangzhi Zhu, XiaoWei Chen 等ICLR 2026
- UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-TuningMingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman OzdaglarNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 61 次
- LLMs Can Reason Faster Only If We Let ThemBilgehan Sel, Lifu Huang, Naren Ramakrishnan, Ruoxi Jia 等ICML 2025
- Learning Together to Perform Better: Teaching Small-Scale LLMs to Collaborate via Preferential Rationale TuningSohan Patnaik, Milan Aggarwal, Sumit Bhatia, Balaji KrishnamurthyACL 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- DOTS: Learning to Reason Dynamically in LLMs via Optimal Reasoning Trajectories SearchMurong Yue, Wenlin Yao, Haitao Mi, Dian Yu 等ICLR 2025
