Learning to Receive Help: Intervention-Aware Concept Embedding Models
Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Katie Collins, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Adrian Weller, Zohreh Shams, Mateja Jamnik
摘要
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) tackle the opacity of neural architectures by constructing and explaining their predictions using a set of high-level concepts. A special property of these models is that they permit concept interventions, wherein users can correct mispredicted concepts and thus improve the model's performance. Recent work, however, has shown that intervention efficacy can be highly dependent on the order in which concepts are intervened on and on the model's architecture and training hyperparameters. We argue that this is rooted in a CBM's lack of train-time incentives for the model to be appropriately receptive to concept interventions. To address this, we propose Intervention-aware Concept Embedding models (IntCEMs), a novel CBM-based architecture and training paradigm that improves a model's receptiveness to test-time interventions. Our model learns a concept intervention policy in an end-to-end fashion from where it can sample meaningful intervention trajectories at train-time. This conditions IntCEMs to effectively select and receive concept interventions when deployed at test-time. Our experiments show that IntCEMs significantly outperform state-of-the-art concept-interpretable models when provided with test-time concept interventions, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper12
- Stochastic Concept Bottleneck ModelsMoritz Vandenhirtz, Sonia Laguna, Ricards Marcinkevics, Julia E. VogtNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 56 次
- Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck ModelsGiovanni de Felice, Arianna Casanova Flores, Francesco De Santis, Silvia Santini 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 20 次
- Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic LensSamuele Bortolotti, Emanuele Marconato, Paolo Morettin, Andrea Passerini 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 17 次
- Understanding Inter-Concept Relationships in Concept-Based ModelsNaveen Raman, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja JamnikICML 2024 · 被引用 12 次
- Deferring Concept Bottleneck Models: Learning to Defer Interventions to Inaccurate ExpertsAndrea Pugnana, Riccardo Massidda, Francesco Giannini, Pietro Barbiero 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 11 次
它引用的顶会 Paper12
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 1,233 次
- On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural NetworksChih-Kuan Yeh, Been Kim, Sercan Ömer Arik, Chun-Liang Li 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 390 次
- Addressing Leakage in Concept Bottleneck ModelsMarton Havasi, Sonali Parbhoo, Finale Doshi-VelezNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 163 次
- Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck ModelsEunji Kim, Dahuin Jung, Sangha Park, Siwon Kim 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 108 次
- Generative causal explanations of black-box classifiersMatthew R. O'Shaughnessy, Gregory Canal, Marissa Connor, Christopher Rozell 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 83 次
相关 Paper
- A Closer Look at the Intervention Procedure of Concept Bottleneck ModelsSungbin Shin, Yohan Jo, Sungsoo Ahn, Namhoon LeeICML 2023 · 被引用 59 次
- Concept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-OffMateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Pietro Barbiero, Gabriele Ciravegna, Giuseppe Marra 等NeurIPS 2022
- Learning to Intervene on Concept BottlenecksDavid Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian KerstingICML 2024 · 被引用 32 次
- Avoiding Leakage Poisoning: Concept Interventions Under Distribution ShiftsMateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Gabriele Dominici, Pietro Barbiero, Zohreh Shams 等ICML 2025
- Interactive Concept Bottleneck ModelsKushal Chauhan, Rishabh Tiwari, Jan Freyberg, Pradeep Shenoy 等AAAI 2023 · 被引用 91 次
