Lune

CSCW2022顶会

Reactions to Fact Checking

D. Scott Appling, Amy S. Bruckman, Munmun De Choudhury

2022年份
13被引次数
5顶会引用

摘要

How do the reasons people post misinformation affect how they respond to fact checking interventions? In this research, we conducted a qualitative study of people who shared misinformation. We started with stories marked as false by a popular fact checker, Snopes, and identified people who posted those stories on Reddit. We interviewed the posters about the story they shared and their five behaviorally distinct personas: Reason to Disagree, Changed Belief, Steadfast Non-Standard Belief, Sharing to Debunk, and Sharing for Humor. Our findings suggest that research to craft better interventions to counter misinformation might benefit from tailoring to specific personas that can serve as design tools for on-going misinformation intervention research.

问问这篇 Paper

问问你的智能体。

Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Lunesearch_papers

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper5

问问它们各自怎么用它

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖