FRIEDA: Benchmarking Multi-Step Cartographic Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Jiyoon Pyo, Yuankun Jiao, Dongwon Jung, Zekun Li, Leeje Jang, Sofia Kirsanova, Jina Kim, Yijun Lin, Qin Liu, Junyi Xie, Hadi Askari, Nan Xu
摘要
Cartographic reasoning is the skill of interpreting geographic relationships by aligning legends, map scales, compass directions, map texts, and geometries across one or more map images. Although essential as a concrete cognitive capability and for critical tasks such as disaster response and urban planning, it remains largely unevaluated. Building on progress in chart and infographic understanding, recent large vision language model (LVLM) works on map visual question-answering (VQA) often simplify maps as a special case of charts. In contrast, map VQA demands comprehension of layered symbology (e.g., symbols, geometries, and text labels) as well as spatial relations tied to orientation and distance that often span multiple maps and are not captured by chart-style evaluations. To address this gap, we introduce FRIEDA, a benchmark for testing complex open-ended cartographic reasoning in LVLMs. FRIEDA sources real map images from documents and reports in various domains (e.g., geology, urban planning, and environmental assessment) and geographical areas. Following classifications in Geographic Information System (GIS) literature, FRIEDA targets all three categories of spatial relations: topological (border, equal, intersect, within), metric (distance), and directional (orientation). All questions require multi-step inference, and many require cross-map grounding and reasoning. We evaluate eleven state-of-the-art LVLMs under two settings: (1) the direct setting, where we provide the maps relevant to the question, and (2) the contextual setting, where the model may have to identify the maps relevant to the question before reasoning. Even the strongest models, Gemini-2.5-Pro and GPT-5-Think, achieve only 38.20% and 37.20% accuracy, respectively, far below human performance of 84.87%. These results reveal a persistent gap in multi-step cartographic reasoning, positioning FRIEDA as a rigorous benchmark to drive progress on spatial intelligence in LVLMs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper11
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 865 次
- SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsAn-Chieh Cheng, Hongxu Yin, Yang Fu, Qiushan Guo 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 412 次
- SlideVQA: A Dataset for Document Visual Question Answering on Multiple ImagesRyota Tanaka, Kyosuke Nishida, Kosuke Nishida, Taku Hasegawa 等AAAI 2023 · 被引用 178 次
- An Empirical Analysis on Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Large Multimodal ModelsFatemeh Shiri, Xiao-Yu Guo, Mona Far, Xin Yu 等EMNLP 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- Intern VL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic TasksZhe Chen, Jiannan Wu, Wenhai Wang, Weijie Su 等CVPR 2024
相关 Paper
- MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial IntelligenceSihan Yang, Runsen Xu, Yiman Xie, Sizhe Yang 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 195 次
- Spatial Reasoning with Vision-Language Models in Ego-Centric Multi-View ScenesMohsen Gholami, Ahmad Rezaei, Zhou Weimin, Sitong Mao 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 67 次
- HiSpatial: Taming Hierarchical 3D Spatial Understanding in Vision-Language ModelsHuizhi Liang, Yichao Shen, Yu Deng, Sicheng Xu 等CVPR 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- GTR-Bench: Evaluating Geo-Temporal Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsQinghongbing Xie, Zhaoyuan Xia, Feng Zhu, Lijun Gong 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- Med-CMR: A Fine-Grained Benchmark Integrating Visual Evidence and Clinical Logic for Medical Complex Multimodal ReasoningHaozhen Gong, Xiaozhong Ji, Yuansen Liu, Wenbin Wu 等CVPR 2026 · 被引用 15 次
