Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Distribution Estimation
Takao Murakami, Yusuke Kawamoto
摘要
LDP (Local Differential Privacy) has been widely studied to estimate statistics of personal data (e.g., distribution underlying the data) while protecting users' privacy. Although LDP does not require a trusted third party, it regards all personal data equally sensitive, which causes excessive obfuscation hence the loss of utility. In this paper, we introduce the notion of ULDP (Utilityoptimized LDP), which provides a privacy guarantee equivalent to LDP only for sensitive data. We first consider the setting where all users use the same obfuscation mechanism, and propose two mechanisms providing ULDP: utilityoptimized randomized response and utility-optimized RAP-POR. We then consider the setting where the distinction between sensitive and non-sensitive data can be different from user to user. For this setting, we propose a personalized ULDP mechanism with semantic tags to estimate the distribution of personal data with high utility while keeping secret what is sensitive for each user. We show, both theoretically and experimentally, that our mechanisms provide much higher utility than the existing LDP mechanisms when there are a lot of non-sensitive data. We also show that when most of the data are non-sensitive, our mechanisms even provide almost the same utility as non-private mechanisms in the low privacy regime.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper13
- Locally Differentially Private Analysis of Graph StatisticsJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 139 次
- LDP-IDS: Local Differential Privacy for Infinite Data StreamsXuebin Ren, Liang Shi, Weiren Yu, Shusen Yang 等SIGMOD 2022 · 被引用 88 次
- Providing Input-Discriminative Protection for Local Differential PrivacyXiaolan Gu, Ming Li, Li Xiong, Yang CaoICDE 2020 · 被引用 60 次
- Improving Utility and Security of the Shuffler-based Differential PrivacyTianhao Wang, Min Xu, Bolin Ding, Jingren Zhou 等VLDB 2020 · 被引用 39 次
- L-SRR: Local Differential Privacy for Location-Based Services with Staircase Randomized ResponseHan Wang, Hanbin Hong, Li Xiong, Zhan Qin 等CCS 2022 · 被引用 37 次
它引用的顶会 Paper6
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 629 次
- Heavy Hitter Estimation over Set-Valued Data with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Yin Yang, Ting Yu, Issa Khalil 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 344 次
- Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information ConstraintPaul Cuff, Lanqing YuCCS 2016 · 被引用 226 次
- BLENDER: Enabling Local Search with a Hybrid Differential Privacy ModelBrendan Avent, Aleksandra Korolova, David Zeber, Torgeir Hovden 等USENIX Security 2017 · 被引用 101 次
- Back to the Drawing Board: Revisiting the Design of Optimal Location Privacy-preserving MechanismsSimon Oya, Carmela Troncoso, Fernando Pérez-GonzálezCCS 2017 · 被引用 80 次
相关 Paper
- Addressing Sensitivity Distinction in Local Differential Privacy: A General Utility-Optimized FrameworkXingyu He, Youwen Zhu, Rongke Liu, Gaoning Pan 等USENIX Security 2025
- Context Aware Local Differential PrivacyJayadev Acharya, Kallista A. Bonawitz, Peter Kairouz, Daniel Ramage 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 49 次
- On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential PrivacyHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien Gambs, Jean-François Couchot, Catuscia PalamidessiVLDB 2023 · 被引用 22 次
- Enhancing Local Differential Privacy Accuracy by Exploiting Inherent UncertaintyPeng Tang, Xiya Shao, Rui Chen, Ning Wang 等SIGMOD 2026
- Censoring with Plausible Deniability: Asymmetric Local Privacy for Multi-Category CDF EstimationQirui Hu, Yi LiuICML 2026
