Tight Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Function Inversion
Kai-Min Chung, Siyao Guo, Qipeng Liu, Luowen Qian
摘要
In function inversion, we are given a function 𝑓 : [𝑁 ] ↦ → [𝑁 ], and want to prepare some advice of size 𝑆, such that we can efficiently invert any image in time 𝑇 . This is a well studied problem with profound connections to cryptography, data structures, communication complexity, and circuit lower bounds. Investigation of this problem in the quantum setting was initiated by Nayebi, Aaronson, Belovs, and Trevisan (2015), who proved a lower bound of 𝑆𝑇 2 = Ω(𝑁 ) for random permutations against classical advice, leaving open an intriguing possibility that Grover's search can be sped up to time Õ( √︀ 𝑁/𝑆). Recent works by Hhan, Xagawa, and Yamakawa (2019), and Chung, Liao, and Qian (2019) extended the argument for random functions and quantum advice, but the lower bound remains 𝑆𝑇 2 = Ω(𝑁 ).
In this work, we prove that even with quantum advice, 𝑆𝑇 + 𝑇 2 = Ω(𝑁 ) is required for an algorithm to invert random functions. This demonstrates that Grover's search is optimal for 𝑆 = Õ( √ 𝑁 ), ruling out any substantial speed-up for Grover's search even with quantum advice. Further improvements to our bounds would imply new classical circuit lower bounds, as shown by Corrigan-Gibbs and Kogan (2019).
To prove this result, we develop a general framework for establishing quantum time-space lower bounds. We further demonstrate the power of our framework by proving the following results.
• Yao's box problem: We prove a tight quantum time-space lower bound for classical advice.
For quantum advice, we prove a first time-space lower bound using shadow tomography. These results resolve two open problems posted by Nayebi et al (2015).
• Salted cryptography: We show that "salting generically provably defeats preprocessing," a result shown by Coretti, Dodis, Guo, and Steinberger (2018), also holds in the quantum setting. In particular, we prove quantum time-space lower bounds for a wide class of salted cryptographic primitives in the quantum random oracle model. This yields the first quantum time-space lower bound for salted collision-finding, which in turn implies that 𝖯𝖶𝖯𝖯 𝒪 ̸ ⊆ 𝖥𝖡𝖰𝖯 𝒪 /𝗊𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗒 relative to a random oracle 𝒪.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper16
- Quantum Cryptography in AlgorithmicaWilliam Kretschmer, Luowen Qian, Makrand Sinha, Avishay TalSTOC 2023 · 被引用 47 次
- Verifiable Quantum Advantage without StructureTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2022 · 被引用 35 次
- Efficient NIZKs and Signatures from Commit-and-Open Protocols in the QROMJelle Don, Serge Fehr, Christian Majenz, Christian SchaffnerCRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 15 次
- A One-Query Lower Bound for Unitary Synthesis and Breaking Quantum CryptographyAlex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, John WrightSTOC 2024 · 被引用 14 次
- Unconditionally Secure Quantum Commitments with PreprocessingLuowen QianCRYPTO 2024 · 被引用 9 次
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- Tight Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Permutation InversionAkshima, Tyler Besselman, Kai-Min Chung, Siyao Guo 等EUROCRYPT 2026
- Non-uniformity and Quantum Advice in the Quantum Random Oracle ModelQipeng LiuEUROCRYPT 2023 · 被引用 7 次
- Revisiting Time-Space Tradeoffs for Function InversionAlexander Golovnev, Siyao Guo, Spencer Peters, Noah Stephens-DavidowitzCRYPTO 2023 · 被引用 5 次
- The Query-Complexity of Preprocessing AttacksAshrujit Ghoshal, Stefano TessaroCRYPTO 2023 · 被引用 7 次
- Non-adaptive Cryptanalytic Time-Space Lower Bounds via a Shearer-Like Inequality for PermutationsItai Dinur, Nathan Keller, Avichai MarmorSTOC 2026
