AdverIntent-Agent: Adversarial Reasoning for Repair Based on Inferred Program Intent
He Ye, Aidan Z. H. Yang, Chang Hu, Yanlin Wang, Tao Zhang, Claire Le Goues
摘要
Automated program repair (APR) has shown promising results, particularly with the use of neural networks. Currently, most APR tools focus on code transformations specified by test suites, rather than reasoning about the program's intent and the high-level bug specification. Without a proper understanding of program intent, these tools tend to generate patches that overfit incomplete test suites and fail to reflect the developer's intentions. However, reasoning about program intent is challenging. In our work, we propose an approach called AdverIntent-Agent, based on critique and adversarial reasoning. Our approach is novel to shift the focus from generating multiple APR patches to inferring multiple potential program intents. Ideally, we aim to infer intents that are, to some extent, adversarial to each other, maximizing the probability that at least one aligns closely with the developer's original intent. AdverIntent-Agent is a multi-agent approach consisting of three agents: a reasoning agent, a test agent, and a repair agent. First, the reasoning agent generates adversarial program intents along with the corresponding faulty statements. Next, the test agent produces adversarial test cases that align with each inferred intent, constructing oracles that use the same inputs but have different expected outputs. Finally, the repair agent uses dynamic and precise LLM prompts to generate patches that satisfy both the inferred program intent and the generated tests. AdverIntent-Agent was evaluated on two benchmarks: Defects4J 2.0 and HumanEval-Java. AdverIntent-Agent correctly repaired 77 and 105 bugs in both benchmarks, respectively. Our work helps reduce the effort required to review patches by enabling developers to assess program intent in natural language, rather than reviewing code patches.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper26
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,068 次
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger 等AAAI 2024 · 被引用 1,292 次
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,085 次
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 858 次
- CoCoNuT: combining context-aware neural translation models using ensemble for program repairThibaud Lutellier, Hung Viet Pham, Lawrence Pang, Yitong Li 等ISSTA 2020 · 被引用 325 次
相关 Paper
- RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program RepairIslem Bouzenia, Premkumar T. Devanbu, Michael PradelICSE 2025 · 被引用 54 次
- PATCHAGENT: A Practical Program Repair Agent Mimicking Human ExpertiseZheng Yu, Ziyi Guo, Yuhang Wu, Jiahao Yu 等USENIX Security 2025
- ThinkRepair: Self-Directed Automated Program RepairXin Yin, Chao Ni, Shaohua Wang, Zhenhao Li 等ISSTA 2024 · 被引用 37 次
- Understanding Automated Program Repair Agents through the Lens of Traceability: An Empirical StudyIra Ceka, Hailie Mitchell, Saurabh Pujar, Luca Buratti 等ISSTA 2026
- PReMM: LLM-Based Program Repair for Multi-method Bugs via Divide and ConquerLinna Xie, Zhong Li, Yu Pei, Zhongzhen Wen 等OOPSLA 2025 · 被引用 1 次
