CAT: Can Trust be Predicted with Context-Awareness in Dynamic Heterogeneous Networks?
Jie Wang, Zheng Yan, Jiahe Lan, Xuyan Li, Elisa Bertino
摘要
Trust prediction provides valuable support for decision-making, risk mitigation, and system security enhancement. Recently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for trust prediction, owing to their ability to learn expressive node representations that capture intricate trust relationships within a network. However, current GNNbased trust prediction models face several limitations: (i) Most of them fail to capture trust dynamicity, leading to questionable inferences. (ii) They rarely consider the heterogeneous nature of real-world networks, resulting in a loss of rich semantics. (iii) None of them support context-awareness, a basic property of trust, making prediction results coarse-grained. To this end, we propose CAT, the first Context-Aware GNNbased Trust prediction model that supports trust dynamicity and accurately represents real-world heterogeneity. CAT consists of a graph construction layer, an embedding layer, a heterogeneous attention layer, and a prediction layer. It handles dynamic graphs using continuous-time representations and captures temporal information through a time encoding function. To model graph heterogeneity and leverage semantic information, CAT employs a dual attention mechanism that identifies the importance of different node types and nodes within each type. For contextawareness, we introduce a new notion of meta-paths to extract contextual features. By constructing context embeddings and integrating a context-aware aggregator, CAT can predict both context-aware trust and overall trust. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that CAT outperforms five groups of baselines in trust prediction, while exhibiting strong scalability to large-scale graphs and robustness against both trust-oriented and GNN-oriented attacks. 1 We use the terms "trust evaluation" and "trust prediction" interchangeably since GNNs focus on predicting future trust relationships based on historical interactions.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper28
- Measuring and Relieving the Over-Smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological ViewDeli Chen, Yankai Lin, Wei Li, Peng Li 等AAAI 2020 · 被引用 1,353 次
- Inductive representation learning on temporal graphsDa Xu, Chuanwei Ruan, Evren Körpeoglu, Sushant Kumar 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 901 次
- GNNGuard: Defending Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial AttacksXiang Zhang, Marinka ZitnikNeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 416 次
- Harnessing Explanations: LLM-to-LM Interpreter for Enhanced Text-Attributed Graph Representation LearningXiaoxin He, Xavier Bresson, Thomas Laurent, Adam Perold 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 151 次
- Flash: A Comprehensive Approach to Intrusion Detection via Provenance Graph Representation LearningMati Ur Rehman, Hadi Ahmadi, Wajih Ul HassanS&P 2024 · 被引用 104 次
相关 Paper
- DTrust: Toward Dynamic Trust Levels Assessment in Time-Varying Online Social NetworksJie Wen, Nan Jiang, Jin Li, Ximeng Liu 等INFOCOM 2023 · 被引用 9 次
- Forecasting Interaction Order on Temporal GraphsWenwen Xia, Yuchen Li, Jianwei Tian, Shenghong LiKDD 2021 · 被引用 8 次
- MAGNN: Metapath Aggregated Graph Neural Network for Heterogeneous Graph EmbeddingXinyu Fu, Jiani Zhang, Ziqiao Meng, Irwin KingWWW 2020 · 被引用 1,149 次
- TP-GNN: Continuous Dynamic Graph Neural Network for Graph ClassificationJie Liu, Jiamou Liu, Kaiqi Zhao, Yanni Tang 等ICDE 2024 · 被引用 9 次
- ContextGNN: Beyond Two-Tower Recommendation SystemsYiwen Yuan, Zecheng Zhang, Xinwei He, Akihiro Nitta 等ICLR 2025
