On Proximity Gaps of Reed-Solomon Codes
Eli Ben-Sasson, Dan Carmon, Ulrich Haböck, Swastik Kopparty, Shubhangi Saraf
摘要
This paper is about the proximity gaps phenomenon for Reed–Solomon codes. Very roughly, the proximity gaps phenomenon for a code C ⊆ Fqn says that for two vectors f,g ∈ Fqn, if sufficiently many linear combinations f + z · g (with z ∈ Fq) are close to C in Hamming distance, then so are both f and g, up to a proximity loss of ε*. Determining the optimal quantitative form of proximity gaps for Reed–Solomon codes has recently become of great interest because of applications to interactive proofs and cryptography, and in particular, to scalable transparent arguments of knowledge (STARKs) and other modern hash based argument systems used on blockchains today. Our main results show improved positive and negative results for proximity gaps for Reed–Solomon codes of constant relative distance δ ∈ (0,1). (1) For proximity gaps up to the unique decoding radius δ/2, we show that arbitrarily small proximity loss ε* > 0 can be achieved with only Oε*(1) exceptional z’s (improving the previous bound of O(n) exceptions). (2) For proximity gaps up to the Johnson radius J(δ), we show that proximity loss ε* = 0 can be achieved with only O(n) exceptional z’s (improving the previous bound of O(n2) exceptions). This significantly reduces the soundness error in the aforementioned arguments systems. In the other direction, we show: (1) for some Reed–Solomon codes and some δ, proximity gaps at or beyond the Johnson radius J(δ) with arbitrarily small proximity loss ε* needs to have at least Ω(n1.99) exceptional z’s. (2) More generally, for all constants τ, we show that for some Reed–Solomon codes and some δ = δ(τ), proximity gaps at radius δ − Ωτ(1) with arbitrarily small proximity loss ε* needs to have nτ exceptional z’s. (3)Finally, for all Reed–Solomon codes, we show that improved proximity gaps imply improved bounds for their list-decodability. This shows that improved bounds on the list-decoding radius of Reed–Solomon codes is a prerequisite for any new proximity gaps results beyond the Johnson radius.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper15
- Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted SetupScott Ames, Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Muthuramakrishnan VenkitasubramaniamCCS 2017 · 被引用 338 次
- Proximity Gaps for Reed-Solomon CodesEli Ben-Sasson, Dan Carmon, Yuval Ishai, Swastik Kopparty 等FOCS 2020 · 被引用 58 次
- BaseFold: Efficient Field-Agnostic Polynomial Commitment Schemes from Foldable CodesHadas Zeilberger, Binyi Chen, Ben FischCRYPTO 2024 · 被引用 38 次
- Polylogarithmic Proofs for Multilinears over Binary TowersBenjamin E. Diamond, Jim PosenEUROCRYPT 2026 · 被引用 36 次
- STIR: Reed-Solomon Proximity Testing with Fewer QueriesGal Arnon, Alessandro Chiesa, Giacomo Fenzi, Eylon YogevCRYPTO 2024 · 被引用 32 次
相关 Paper
- Optimal Proximity Gaps for Subspace-Design Codes and (Random) Reed-Solomon CodesRohan Goyal, Venkatesan GuruswamiSTOC 2026 · 被引用 16 次
- Code-Based Scalable Collaborative SNARKsChristodoulos Pappas, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, Charalampos PapamanthouS&P 2026
- On Reed-Solomon Proximity Gaps ConjecturesElizabeth C. Crites, Alistair StewartCRYPTO 2026 · 被引用 13 次
- Improved List-Decodability and List-Recoverability of Reed-Solomon Codes via Tree Packings: [Extended Abstract]Zeyu Guo, Ray Li, Chong Shangguan, Itzhak Tamo 等FOCS 2021 · 被引用 9 次
- List-decodability with large radius for Reed-Solomon codesAsaf Ferber, Matthew Kwan, Lisa SauermannFOCS 2021 · 被引用 17 次
