Automata-Based Trace Analysis for Aiding Diagnosing GUI Testing Tools for Android
Enze Ma, Shan Huang, Weigang He, Ting Su, Jue Wang, Huiyu Liu, Geguang Pu, Zhendong Su
摘要
Benchmarking software testing tools against known bugs is a classic approach to evaluating the tools' bug finding abilities. However, this approach is difficult to give some clues on the tool-missed bugs to aid diagnosing the testing tools. As a result, heavy and ad hoc manual analysis is needed. In this work, in the setting of GUI testing for Android apps, we introduce an automata-based trace analysis approach to tackling the key challenge of manual analysis, i.e., how to analyze the lengthy event traces generated by a testing tool against a missed bug to find the clues. Our key idea is that, we model a bug in the form of a finite automaton which captures its bug-triggering traces; and match the event traces generated by the testing tool (which misses this bug) against this automaton to obtain the clues. Specifically, the clues are presented in the form of three designated automata-based coverage values. We apply our approach to enhance Themis, a representative benchmark suite for Android, to aid diagnosing GUI testing tools. Our extensive evaluation on nine state-of-the-art GUI testing tools and the involvement with several tool developers shows that our approach is feasible and useful. Our approach enables Themis + (the enhanced benchmark suite) to provide the clues on the tool-missed bugs, and all the Themis + 's clues are identical or useful, compared to the manual analysis results of tool developers. Moreover, the clues have helped find several tool weaknesses, which were unknown or unclear before. Based on the clues, two actively-developing industrial testing tools in our study have quickly made several optimizations and demonstrated their improved bug finding abilities. All the tool developers give positive feedback on the usefulness and usability of Themis + 's clues. Themis + is available at https:// github.com/ DDroid-Android/ home.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper10
- Evaluating Fuzz TestingGeorge Klees, Andrew Ruef, Benji Cooper, Shiyi Wei 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 753 次
- LAVA: Large-Scale Automated Vulnerability AdditionBrendan Dolan-Gavitt, Patrick Hulin, Engin Kirda, Tim Leek 等S&P 2016 · 被引用 354 次
- Reinforcement learning based curiosity-driven testing of Android applicationsMinxue Pan, An Huang, Guoxin Wang, Tian Zhang 等ISSTA 2020 · 被引用 166 次
- Time-travel testing of Android appsZhen Dong, Marcel Böhme, Lucia Cojocaru, Abhik RoychoudhuryICSE 2020 · 被引用 104 次
- Benchmarking automated GUI testing for Android against real-world bugsTing Su, Jue Wang, Zhendong SuFSE 2021 · 被引用 77 次
相关 Paper
- From Suspicious Signals to Crashes: Guiding Bug-Driven GUI Testing via Code-Inspired TracingMengzhuo Chen, Zhe Liu, Chunyang Chen, Junjie Wang 等FSE 2026
- Context-aware Bug Reproduction for Mobile AppsYuchao Huang, Junjie Wang, Zhe Liu, Song Wang 等ICSE 2023 · 被引用 7 次
- Mobile Application Coverage: The 30% Curse and Ways ForwardFaridah Akinotcho, Lili Wei, Julia RubinICSE 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- Detecting non-crashing functional bugs in Android apps via deep-state differential analysisJue Wang, Yanyan Jiang, Ting Su, Shaohua Li 等FSE 2022 · 被引用 26 次
- Fully automated functional fuzzing of Android apps for detecting non-crashing logic bugsTing Su, Yichen Yan, Jue Wang, Jingling Sun 等OOPSLA 2021 · 被引用 58 次
