Postmortem Program Analysis with Hardware-Enhanced Post-Crash Artifacts
Jun Xu, Dongliang Mu, Xinyu Xing, Peng Liu, Ping Chen, Bing Mao
摘要
While a core dump carries a large amount of information, it barely serves as informative debugging aids in locating software faults because it carries information that indicates only a partial chronology of how program reached a crash site. Recently, this situation has been significantly improved. With the emergence of hardwareassisted processor tracing, software developers and security analysts can trace program execution and integrate them into a core dump. In comparison with an ordinary core dump, the new post-crash artifact provides software developers and security analysts with more clues as to a program crash. To use it for failure diagnosis, however, it still requires strenuous manual efforts. In this work, we propose POMP, an automated tool to facilitate the analysis of post-crash artifacts. More specifically, POMP introduces a new reverse execution mechanism to construct the data flow that a program followed prior to its crash. By using the data flow, POMP then performs backward taint analysis and highlights those program statements that actually contribute to the crash. To demonstrate its effectiveness in pinpointing program statements truly pertaining to a program crash, we have implemented POMP for Linux system on x86-32 platform, and tested it against various program crashes resulting from 31 distinct real-world security vulnerabilities. We show that, POMP can accurately and efficiently pinpoint program statements that truly pertain to the crashes, making failure diagnosis significantly convenient.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper22
- Understanding the Reproducibility of Crowd-reported Security VulnerabilitiesDongliang Mu, Alejandro Cuevas, Limin Yang, Hang Hu 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 138 次
- DEEPVSA: Facilitating Value-set Analysis with Deep Learning for Postmortem Program AnalysisWenbo Guo, Dongliang Mu, Xinyu Xing, Min Du 等USENIX Security 2019 · 被引用 67 次
- ARCUS: Symbolic Root Cause Analysis of Exploits in Production SystemsCarter Yagemann, Matthew Pruett, Simon P. Chung, Kennon Bittick 等USENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 42 次
- Understanding the Security of ARM Debugging FeaturesZhenyu Ning, Fengwei ZhangS&P 2019 · 被引用 41 次
- Facilitating Vulnerability Assessment through PoC MigrationJiarun Dai, Yuan Zhang, Hailong Xu, Haiming Lyu 等CCS 2021 · 被引用 26 次
它引用的顶会 Paper1
相关 Paper
- AURORA: Statistical Crash Analysis for Automated Root Cause ExplanationTim Blazytko, Moritz Schlögel, Cornelius Aschermann, Ali Abbasi 等USENIX Security 2020
- Reverse Debugging of Kernel Failures in Deployed SystemsXinyang Ge, Ben Niu, Weidong CuiUSENIX ATC 2020 · 被引用 29 次
- The Code That Never Ran: Modeling Attacks on Speculative EvaluationCraig Disselkoen, Radha Jagadeesan, Alan Jeffrey, James RielyS&P 2019 · 被引用 24 次
- HardTaint: Production-Run Dynamic Taint Analysis via Selective Hardware TracingYiyu Zhang, Tianyi Liu, Yueyang Wang, Yun Qi 等OOPSLA 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- HeapHopper: Bringing Bounded Model Checking to Heap Implementation SecurityMoritz Eckert, Antonio Bianchi, Ruoyu Wang, Yan Shoshitaishvili 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 62 次
