PoseX: AI Defeats Physics-based Methods on Protein Ligand Cross-Docking
Yize Jiang, Xinze Li, Yuanyuan Zhang, Jin Han, Youjun Xu, Ayush Pandit, Zaixi Zhang, Mengdi Wang, Mengyang Wang, Chong Liu, Guang Yang, Yejin Choi
摘要
Recently, significant progress has been made in protein-ligand docking, especially in deep learning methods, and some benchmarks were proposed, such as PoseBench and PLINDER. However, these studies typically focus on the self-docking scenario, which is less practical in real-world applications. Moreover, some studies employ complex frameworks that require extensive training, posing challenges for convenient and efficient assessment of docking methods. To address these gaps, we introduce PoseX, an open-source benchmark for evaluating both self-docking and cross-docking, enabling a practical and comprehensive assessment of algorithmic advances. Specifically, we curated a novel dataset comprising 718 entries for self-docking and 1,312 entries for cross-docking; secondly, we incorporated 23 docking methods in three methodological categories, including physics-based methods (e.g., Schrödinger Glide), AI docking methods (e.g., DiffDock) and AI co-folding methods (e.g., AlphaFold3); thirdly, we developed a relaxation method for post-processing to minimize conformational energy and refine binding poses; fourthly, we established a public leaderboard to rank submitted models in real-time. We derived some key insights and conclusions through extensive experiments: (1) AI-based approaches consistently outperform physics-based methods in overall docking success rate. (2) Most intra- and intermolecular clashes of AI-based approaches can be greatly alleviated with relaxation, which means combining AI modeling with physics-based post-processing could achieve excellent performance. (3) AI co-folding methods exhibit ligand chirality issues, except for Boltz-1x, which introduced physics-inspired potentials to fix hallucinations, suggesting that stereochemical modeling greatly improves the structural plausibility of the predicted protein-ligand complexes. (4) Specifying binding pockets significantly promotes docking performance, indicating that pocket information can be leveraged adequately, particularly for AI co-folding methods, in future modeling efforts.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper5
- TANKBind: Trigonometry-Aware Neural NetworKs for Drug-Protein Binding Structure PredictionWei Lu, Qifeng Wu, Jixian Zhang, Jiahua Rao 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 254 次
- Molformer: Motif-Based Transformer on 3D Heterogeneous Molecular GraphsFang Wu, Dragomir Radev, Stan Z. LiAAAI 2023 · 被引用 96 次
- Reinforced Genetic Algorithm for Structure-based Drug DesignTianfan Fu, Wenhao Gao, Connor W. Coley, Jimeng SunNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 79 次
- Deep Confident Steps to New Pockets: Strategies for Docking GeneralizationGabriele Corso, Arthur Deng, Nicholas Polizzi, Regina Barzilay 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 79 次
- FABind: Fast and Accurate Protein-Ligand BindingQizhi Pei, Kaiyuan Gao, Lijun Wu, Jinhua Zhu 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 41 次
相关 Paper
- E3Bind: An End-to-End Equivariant Network for Protein-Ligand DockingYangtian Zhang, Huiyu Cai, Chence Shi, Jian TangICLR 2023 · 被引用 13 次
- DiffDock: Diffusion Steps, Twists, and Turns for Molecular DockingGabriele Corso, Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing, Regina Barzilay 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 331 次
- Re-Dock: Towards Flexible and Realistic Molecular Docking with Diffusion BridgeYufei Huang, Odin Zhang, Lirong Wu, Cheng Tan 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 23 次
- SigmaDock: Untwisting Molecular Docking with Fragment-Based SE(3) DiffusionAlvaro Prat, Leo Zhang, Charlotte M. Deane, Yee Whye Teh 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- EBMDock: Neural Probabilistic Protein-Protein Docking via a Differentiable Energy ModelHuaijin Wu, Wei Liu, Yatao Bian, Jiaxiang Wu 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 5 次
