KRAMABENCH: A Benchmark for AI Systems on Data-to-Insight Pipelines over Data Lakes
Eugenie Lai, Gerardo Vitagliano, Ziyu Zhang, Om Chabra, SIVAPRASAD SUDHIR, Anna Zeng, Anton A. Zabreyko, Chenning Li, Ferdi Kossmann, Jialin Ding, Jun Chen, Markos Markakis
摘要
Discovering insights from a real-world data lake potentially containing unclean, semi-structured, and unstructured data requires a variety of data processing tasks, ranging from extraction and cleaning to integration, analysis, and modeling. This process often also demands domain knowledge and project-specific insight. While AI models have shown remarkable results in reasoning and code generation, their abilities to design and execute complex pipelines that solve these data-lake-to-insight challenges remain unclear. We introduce KramaBench which consists of 104 manually curated and solved challenges spanning 1700 files, 24 data sources, and 6 domains. KramaBench focuses on testing the end-to-end capabilities of AI systems to solve challenges which require automated orchestration of different data tasks. KramaBench also features a comprehensive evaluation framework assessing the pipeline design and individual data task implementation abilities of AI systems. We evaluate 8 LLMs using our single-agent reference framework DS-Guru, alongside both open- and closed-source single- and multi-agent systems, and find that while current agentic systems may handle isolated data-science tasks and generate plausible draft pipelines, they struggle with producing working end-to-end pipelines. On KramaBench, the best system reaches only 55% end-to-end accuracy in the full data-lake setting. Even with perfect retrieval, the accuracy tops out at 62%. Leading LLMs can identify up to 42% of important data tasks but can only fully implement 20% of individual data tasks.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation?Jingzhe Xu, Rui Wang, Jiannan Wang, Guoliang LiVLDB 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- CoDA-Bench: Can Code Agents Handle Data-Intensive Tasks?Yuxin Zhang, Ju Fan, Meihao Fan, Shaolei Zhang 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 2 次
它引用的顶会 Paper19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 19,162 次
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,828 次
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 2,082 次
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang 等ICML 2023 · 被引用 504 次
相关 Paper
- ELT-Bench: An End-to-End Benchmark for Evaluating AI Agents on ELT PipelinesTengjun Jin, Yuxuan Zhu, Daniel KangVLDB 2026 · 被引用 13 次
- DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao 等ICLR 2025
- DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsYiming Huang, Jianwen Luo, Yan Yu, Yitong Zhang 等EMNLP 2024 · 被引用 7 次
- DSCodeBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationShuyin Ouyang, Dong Huang, Jingwen Guo, Zeyu Sun 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 10 次
- ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific DiscoveryZiru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang 等ICLR 2025 · 被引用 6 次
