On Sensitivity of Learning with Limited Labelled Data to the Effects of Randomness: Impact of Interactions and Systematic Choices
Branislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Mária Bieliková
摘要
While learning with limited labelled data can effectively deal with a lack of labels, it is also sensitive to the effects of uncontrolled randomness introduced by so-called randomness factors (i.e., non-deterministic decisions such as choice or order of samples). We propose and formalise a method to systematically investigate the effects of individual randomness factors while taking the interactions (dependence) between them into consideration. To this end, our method mitigates the effects of other factors while observing how the performance varies across multiple runs. Applying our method to multiple randomness factors across in-context learning and fine-tuning approaches on 7 representative text classification tasks and metalearning on 3 tasks, we show that: 1) disregarding interactions between randomness factors in existing works led to inconsistent findings due to incorrect attribution of the effects of randomness factors, such as disproving the consistent sensitivity of in-context learning to sample order even with random sample selection; and 2) besides mutual interactions, the effects of randomness factors, especially sample order, are also dependent on more systematic choices unexplored in existing works, such as number of classes, samples per class or choice of prompt format.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Comparing Specialised Small and General Large Language Models on Text Classification: 100 Labelled Samples to Achieve Break-Even PerformanceBranislav Pecher, Ivan Srba, Mária BielikováEMNLP 2025 · 被引用 6 次
- The Good, the Bad, and the Debatable: A Survey on the Impacts of Data for In-Context LearningStephanie Schoch, Yangfeng JiEMNLP 2025
它引用的顶会 Paper10
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel 等ACL 2022 · 被引用 1,494 次
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 被引用 682 次
- On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong BaselinesMarius Mosbach, Maksym Andriushchenko, Dietrich KlakowICLR 2021 · 被引用 448 次
- Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot AnymoreChangmao Li, Jeffrey FlaniganAAAI 2024 · 被引用 138 次
- CrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLPQinyuan Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Xiang RenEMNLP 2021 · 被引用 103 次
相关 Paper
- What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task HypothesisJiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan CotterellACL 2024 · 被引用 5 次
- Rethinking Invariance in In-context LearningLizhe Fang, Yifei Wang, Khashayar Gatmiry, Lei Fang 等ICLR 2025
- Meta-in-context learning in large language modelsJulian Coda-Forno, Marcel Binz, Zeynep Akata, Matt M. Botvinick 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 81 次
- Prompt Optimization with EASE? Efficient Ordering-aware Automated Selection of ExemplarsZhaoxuan Wu, Xiaoqiang Lin, Zhongxiang Dai, Wenyang Hu 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 44 次
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe 等EMNLP 2022 · 被引用 634 次
